mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Interoperability in AI Safety Governance: Ethics, Regulations, and Standards

arXiv 2601.06153 ↗First posted 6 Jan 2026cs.CY cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This policy report draws on country studies from China, South Korea, Singapore, and the United Kingdom to identify effective tools and key barriers to interoperability in AI safety governance. It offers practical recommendations to support a globally informed yet locally grounded governance ecosystem. Interoperability is a central goal of AI governance, vital for reducing risks, fostering innovation, enhancing competitiveness, promoting standardization, and building public trust. However, structural gaps such as fragmented regulations and lack of global coordination, and conceptual gaps, including limited Global South engagement, continue to hinder progress. Focusing on three high-stakes domains - autonomous vehicles, education, and cross-border data flows - the report compares ethical, legal, and technical frameworks across the four countries. It identifies areas of convergence, divergence, and potential alignment, offering policy recommendations that support the development of interoperability mechanisms aligned with the Global Digital Compact and relevant UN resolutions. The analysis covers seven components: objectives, regulators, ethics, binding measures, targeted frameworks, technical standards, and key risks.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 6 Jan 2026.

Builds on

0 of 0 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Not cited yet.