mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Sequential Subspace Noise Injection Prevents Accuracy Collapse in Certified Unlearning

arXiv 2601.05134 ↗First posted 8 Jan 2026cs.LGcited by 0

On the map: LLM safety and security → Machine unlearning

Abstract (arXiv)

Certified unlearning based on differential privacy offers strong guarantees but remains largely impractical: the noisy fine-tuning approaches proposed so far achieve these guarantees but severely reduce model accuracy. We propose sequential noise scheduling, which distributes the noise budget across orthogonal subspaces of the parameter space, rather than injecting it all at once. This simple modification mitigates the destructive effect of noise while preserving the original certification guarantees. We extend the analysis of noisy fine-tuning to the subspace setting, proving that the same (varepsilon,δ) privacy budget is retained. Empirical results on image classification benchmarks show that our approach substantially improves accuracy after unlearning while remaining robust to membership inference attacks. These results show that certified unlearning can achieve both rigorous guarantees and practical utility.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Machine unlearning, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 28 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jan 2026.

Builds on

28 of 35 references.

Closest ancestors · 11

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Certified Unlearning for Neural Networks8 Jun
  2. 2024The Utility and Complexity of in- and out-of-Distribution Machine Unlearning12 Dec
  3. 2024Towards Certified Unlearning for Deep Neural Networks1 Aug
  4. 2024Langevin Unlearning: A New Perspective of Noisy Gradient Descent for Machine Unlearning18 Jan
  5. 2023Certified Minimax Unlearning with Generalization Rates and Deletion Capacity16 Dec
  6. 2023SalUn: Empowering Machine Unlearning via Gradient-based Weight Saliency in Both Image Classification and Generation19 Oct
  7. 2023Model Sparsity Can Simplify Machine Unlearning11 Apr
  8. 2023Towards Unbounded Machine Unlearning20 Feb
  9. 2022A Survey of Machine Unlearning6 Sep
  10. 2021Machine Unlearning of Features and Labels26 Aug
  11. 2021Remember What You Want to Forget: Algorithms for Machine Unlearning4 Mar

Other references · 17

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
  4. 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,714
  5. 2017Renyi Differential Privacycited by 643
  6. 2015Train faster, generalize better: Stability of stochastic gradient descentcited by 547
  7. 2019Certified Data Removal from Machine Learning Modelscited by 512
  8. 2020Descent-to-Delete: Gradient-Based Methods for Machine Unlearningcited by 303
  9. 2020Stability of Stochastic Gradient Descent on Nonsmooth Convex Lossescited by 172
  10. 2018Privacy Amplification by Iterationcited by 97
  11. 2019Hypothesis Testing Interpretations and Renyi Differential Privacycited by 84
  12. 2022Exploring the Limits of Differentially Private Deep Learning with Group-wise Clippingcited by 52
5 more
  1. 2017Algorithmic stability and hypothesis complexitycited by 39
  2. 2025The European Union general data protection regulation: what it is and what it meanscited by 30
  3. 2021Stability & Generalisation of Gradient Descent for Shallow Neural Networks without the Neural Tangent Kernelcited by 25
  4. 2022Stability and Generalization Analysis of Gradient Methods for Shallow Neural Networkscited by 21
  5. 2023Batch Clipping and Adaptive Layerwise Clipping for Differential Private Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.