Graph energy as a measure of community detectability in networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
A key challenge in network science is the detection of communities, which are sets of nodes in a network that are densely connected internally but sparsely connected to the rest of the network. A fundamental result in community detection is the existence of a nontrivial threshold for community detectability on sparse graphs that are generated by the planted partition model (PPM). Below this so-called ``detectability limit'', no community-detection method can perform better than random chance. Spectral methods for community detection fail before this detectability limit because the eigenvalues corresponding to the eigenvectors that are relevant for community detection can be absorbed by the bulk of the spectrum. One can bypass the detectability problem by using special matrices, like the non-backtracking matrix, but this requires one to consider higher-dimensional matrices. In this paper, we show that the difference in graph energy between a PPM and an ErdHos--R'enyi (ER) network has a distinct transition at the detectability threshold even for the adjacency matrices of the underlying networks. The graph energy is based on the full spectrum of an adjacency matrix, so our result suggests that standard graph matrices still allow one to separate the parameter regions with detectable and undetectable communities.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jan 2026.
Builds on
17 of 57 references.
References · 17
- 2017Community Detection and Stochastic Block Modelscited by 317
- 2016Community detection in networks: A user guidecited by 105
- 2013Spectral redemption: clustering sparse networkscited by 54
- 2013A Proof Of The Block Model Threshold Conjecturecited by 35
- 2017Bayesian stochastic blockmodelingcited by 27
- 202220 years of network community detectioncited by 23
- 2017The Computer Science and Physics of Community Detection: Landscapes, Phase Transitions, and Hardnesscited by 20
- 2014Scalable detection of statistically significant communities and hierarchies, using message-passing for modularitycited by 16
- 2022Complex networks with complex weightscited by 9
- 2015Detectability thresholds and optimal algorithms for community structure in dynamic networkscited by 7
- 2025Sharp Phase Transitions in Estimation with Low-Degree Polynomialscited by 7
- 2018Spectral Embedding Norm: Looking Deep into the Spectrum of the Graph Laplaciancited by 6
5 more
- 2025Stochastic block models with many communities and the Kesten--Stigum boundcited by 4
- 2013Spectra of random graphs with community structure and arbitrary degreescited by 3
- 2016A Framework for the Construction of Generative Models for Mesoscale Structure in Multilayer Networkscited by 3
- 2025Phase Transition for Stochastic Block Model with more than √n Communities (II)cited by 3
- 2019Spectra of random networks with arbitrary degreescited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.