mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Projected Autoregression: Autoregressive Language Generation in Continuous State Space

arXiv 2601.04854 ↗First posted 8 Jan 2026cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Standard autoregressive language models generate text by repeatedly selecting a discrete next token, coupling prediction with irreversible commitment at every step. We show that token selection is not the only viable autoregressive interface. Projected Autoregression replaces token selection with continuous prediction in embedding space followed by discrete projection at commitment time. The model predicts next-token vectors via regression and contrastive objectives, while discrete tokens arise only by nearest-neighbor projection. An optional mutable suffix (``liquid tail'') enables iterative refinement before commitment, but the central change is more basic: next-step prediction is continuous, and discrete tokens are produced only as a downstream interface. Projected Autoregression establishes a concrete alternative to token-selection autoregression: language generation can be organized around continuous-state prediction with delayed discrete commitment. Refinement remains local to a short causal suffix within a left-to-right causal process, rather than a sequence-wide denoising process. This separation has two consequences. First, it induces a distinct generation regime: even with immediate projection (K=1), continuous prediction yields text structure and dynamics that differ from tested token-space AR baselines, including a compute-matched best-of-16 reranking baseline. Second, it exposes a continuous control surface inside autoregressive generation: direction rate, history noise, delayed commitment, state-space guidance, and embedding geometry act directly on the evolving generative state before token commitment. Taken together, these results place repeated token selection within a larger family of autoregressive interfaces and expose continuous state space as a broader algorithmic design space for language generation.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 13 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jan 2026.

Builds on

13 of 13 references.

References · 13

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2022Classifier-Free Diffusion Guidancecited by 5,847
  3. 2022Fast Inference from Transformers via Speculative Decodingcited by 1,653
  4. 2024The FineWeb Datasets: Decanting the Web for the Finest Text Data at Scalecited by 1,160
  5. 2024Simple and Effective Masked Diffusion Language Modelscited by 848
  6. 2024Training Large Language Models to Reason in a Continuous Latent Spacecited by 797
  7. 2023Discrete Diffusion Modeling by Estimating the Ratios of the Data Distributioncited by 745
  8. 2025Dream 7B: Diffusion Large Language Modelscited by 544
  9. 2021MAUVE: Measuring the Gap Between Neural Text and Human Text using Divergence Frontierscited by 470
  10. 2025DiffuCoder: Understanding and Improving Masked Diffusion Models for Code Generationcited by 187
  11. 2024Granite Code Models: A Family of Open Foundation Models for Code Intelligencecited by 117
  12. 2025TiDAR: Think in Diffusion, Talk in Autoregressioncited by 37
1 more
  1. 2025Continuous Autoregressive Language Modelscited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.