When AI Settles Down: Late-Stage Stability as a Signature of AI-Generated Text Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Zero-shot detection methods for AI-generated text typically aggregate token-level statistics across entire sequences, overlooking the temporal dynamics inherent to autoregressive generation. We analyze over 120k text samples and reveal Late-Stage Volatility Decay: AI-generated text exhibits rapidly stabilizing log probability fluctuations as generation progresses, while human writing maintains higher variability throughout. This divergence peaks in the second half of sequences, where AI-generated text shows 24--32% lower volatility. Based on this finding, we propose two simple features: Derivative Dispersion and Local Volatility, which computed exclusively from late-stage statistics. Without perturbation sampling or additional model access, our method achieves state-of-the-art performance on EvoBench and MAGE benchmarks and demonstrates strong complementarity with existing global methods.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jan 2026.
Builds on
17 of 24 references.
References · 17
- 2023DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability Curvaturecited by 705
- 2023The Falcon Series of Open Language Modelscited by 526
- 2019Release Strategies and the Social Impacts of Language Modelscited by 505
- 2019GLTR: Statistical Detection and Visualization of Generated Textcited by 490
- 2023Fast-DetectGPT: Efficient Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text via Conditional Probability Curvaturecited by 278
- 2019Automatic Detection of Generated Text is Easiest when Humans are Fooledcited by 260
- 2024Spotting LLMs With Binoculars: Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Textcited by 255
- 2023DetectLLM: Leveraging Log Rank Information for Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Textcited by 207
- 2023MAGE: Machine-generated Text Detection in the Wildcited by 130
- 2023DNA-GPT: Divergent N-Gram Analysis for Training-Free Detection of GPT-Generated Textcited by 127
- 2023Intrinsic Dimension Estimation for Robust Detection of AI-Generated Textscited by 111
- 2023A Survey on Detection of LLMs-Generated Contentcited by 70
5 more
- 2024Training-free LLM-generated Text Detection by Mining Token Probability Sequencescited by 33
- 2024Detecting Subtle Differences between Human and Model Languages Using Spectrum of Relative Likelihoodcited by 24
- 2025DetectAnyLLM: Towards Generalizable and Robust Detection of Machine-Generated Text Across Domains and Modelscited by 8
- 2025MGT-Prism: Enhancing Domain Generalization for Machine-Generated Text Detection via Spectral Alignmentcited by 4
- 2025A Theoretical Analysis of Detecting Large Model-Generated Time Seriescited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.
4 papers.
- 2026Minimizing Mismatch Risk: A Prototype-Based Routing Framework for Zero-shot LLM-generated Text Detectioncited by 2
- 2026Motion-Aware Caching for Efficient Autoregressive Video Generationcited by 2
- 2026Log-Likelihood, Simpson's Paradox, and the Detection of Machine-Generated Textcited by 0
- 2026Latent Trajectory Discrimination for AI-Generated Text Detectioncited by 0
- 2026Latent Trajectory Discrimination for AI-Generated Text Detection16 Jul 2026
- 2026Log-Likelihood, Simpson's Paradox, and the Detection of Machine-Generated Text7 May 2026
- 2026Motion-Aware Caching for Efficient Autoregressive Video Generation3 May 2026
- 2026Minimizing Mismatch Risk: A Prototype-Based Routing Framework for Zero-shot LLM-generated Text Detection1 Feb 2026