Where meaning lives: Layer-wise accessibility of psycholinguistic features in encoder and decoder language models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Understanding where transformer language models encode psychologically meaningful aspects of meaning is essential for both theory and practice. We conduct a systematic layer-wise probing study of 58 psycholinguistic features across 10 transformer models, spanning encoder-only and decoder-only architectures, and compare three embedding extraction methods. We find that apparent localization of meaning is strongly method-dependent: contextualized embeddings yield higher feature-specific selectivity and different layer-wise profiles than isolated embeddings. Across models and methods, final-layer representations are rarely optimal for recovering psycholinguistic information with linear probes. Despite these differences, models exhibit a shared depth ordering of meaning dimensions, with lexical properties peaking earlier and experiential and affective dimensions peaking later. Together, these results show that where meaning "lives" in transformer models reflects an interaction between methodological choices and architectural constraints.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jan 2026.
Builds on
19 of 39 references.
References · 19
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
- 2019Language Models as Knowledge Bases?cited by 1,936
- 2021DeBERTaV3: Improving DeBERTa using ELECTRA-Style Pre-Training with Gradient-Disentangled Embedding Sharingcited by 1,254
- 2019BERT Rediscovers the Classical NLP Pipelinecited by 1,059
- 2021Probing Classifiers: Promises, Shortcomings, and Advancescited by 876
- 2019How Contextual are Contextualized Word Representations? Comparing the Geometry of BERT, ELMo, and GPT-2 Embeddingscited by 784
- 2019Designing and Interpreting Probes with Control Taskscited by 640
- 2023Towards Best Practices of Activation Patching in Language Models: Metrics and Methodscited by 359
- 2025Layer by Layer: Uncovering Hidden Representations in Language Modelscited by 311
- 2020Probing the Probing Paradigm: Does Probing Accuracy Entail Task Relevance?cited by 151
7 more
- 2024jina-embeddings-v3: Multilingual Embeddings With Task LoRAcited by 141
- 2019Open Sesame: Getting Inside BERT's Linguistic Knowledgecited by 120
- 2024Fantastic Semantics and Where to Find Them: Investigating Which Layers of Generative LLMs Reflect Lexical Semanticscited by 44
- 2021Do Language Models Know the Way to Rome?cited by 18
- 2025Decoding Emotion in the Deep: A Systematic Study of How LLMs Represent, Retain, and Express Emotioncited by 12
- 2025Revealing emergent human-like conceptual representations from language predictioncited by 6
- 2024Probing the contents of semantic representations from text, behavior, and brain data using the psychNorms metabasecited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Linguistic Interpretability of Transformer-based Language Models: a systematic review
- 2026Post-Hoc Understanding of Metaphor Processing in Decoder-Only Language Models via Conditional Scale Entropy
- 2026Divergent large language model predictions from convergent representations in ambiguous word pairs
- 2026Do Language Models Encode Semantic Relations? Probing and Sparse Feature Analysis
- 2026Cross-lingual brain-language model alignment is robust but challenges hierarchical and computational accounts
- 2024Bridging Linguistic Structure and Mechanistic Interpretability for Conceptual Interpretation in Language Models
- 2026Memory Retrieval in Transformers: Insights from The Encoding Specificity Principle
- 2024Vision-Language Models Align with Human Neural Representations in Concept Processing