How Does the Thinking Step Influence Model Safety? An Entropy-based Safety Reminder for LRMs
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning for agents, planning and code
Abstract (arXiv)
Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) achieve remarkable success through explicit thinking steps, yet the thinking steps introduce a novel risk by potentially amplifying unsafe behaviors. Despite this vulnerability, conventional defense mechanisms remain ineffective as they overlook the unique reasoning dynamics of LRMs. In this work, we find that the emergence of safe-reminding phrases within thinking steps plays a pivotal role in ensuring LRM safety. Motivated by this finding, we propose SafeRemind, a decoding-time defense method that dynamically injects safe-reminding phrases into thinking steps. By leveraging entropy triggers to intervene at decision-locking points, SafeRemind redirects potentially harmful trajectories toward safer outcomes without requiring any parameter updates. Extensive evaluations across five LRMs and six benchmarks demonstrate that SafeRemind substantially enhances safety, achieving improvements of up to 45.5%p while preserving core reasoning utility.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning for agents, planning and code, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 18 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jan 2026.
Builds on
18 of 37 references.
Closest ancestors · 6
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Safety in Large Reasoning Models: A Survey24 Apr
- 2025RealSafe-R1: Safety-Aligned DeepSeek-R1 without Compromising Reasoning Capability14 Apr
- 2025Safety Tax: Safety Alignment Makes Your Large Reasoning Models Less Reasonable1 Mar
- 2025H-CoT: Hijacking the Chain-of-Thought Safety Reasoning Mechanism to Jailbreak Large Reasoning Models, Including OpenAI o1/o3, DeepSeek-R1, and Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking18 Feb
- 2025The Hidden Risks of Large Reasoning Models: A Safety Assessment of R118 Feb
- 2025o3-mini vs DeepSeek-R1: Which One is Safer?30 Jan
Other references · 12
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
- 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,330
- 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,942
- 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Modelscited by 3,104
- 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,879
- 2023Llama Guard: LLM-based Input-Output Safeguard for Human-AI Conversationscited by 1,207
- 2023Baseline Defenses for Adversarial Attacks Against Aligned Language Modelscited by 651
- 2023Detecting Language Model Attacks with Perplexitycited by 431
- 2023Jailbreak and Guard Aligned Language Models with Only Few In-Context Demonstrationscited by 431
- 2023DeepInception: Hypnotize Large Language Model to Be Jailbreakercited by 367
- 2025AM-Thinking-v1: Advancing the Frontier of Reasoning at 32B Scalecited by 29
- 2024Speech Translation with Speech Foundation Models and Large Language Models: What is There and What is Missing?cited by 23
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025SafeRBench: Dissecting the Reasoning Safety of Large Language Models
- 2026Towards Safer Large Reasoning Models by Promoting Safety Decision-Making before Chain-of-Thought Generation
- 2026Chain of Risk: Safety Failures in Large Reasoning Models and Mitigation via Adaptive Multi-Principle Steering
- 2025When Models Outthink Their Safety: Unveiling and Mitigating Self-Jailbreak in Large Reasoning Models
- 2025Beyond Safe Answers: A Benchmark for Evaluating True Risk Awareness in Large Reasoning Models
- 2025ReasoningGuard: Safeguarding Large Reasoning Models with Inference-time Safety Aha Moments
- 2025Towards Safe Reasoning in Large Reasoning Models via Corrective Intervention
- 2026First Token Matters: Understanding Safety Collapse in Large Reasoning Models