mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

SyncThink: A Training-Free Strategy to Align Inference Termination with Reasoning Saturation

arXiv 2601.03649 ↗First posted 7 Jan 2026cs.CLcited by 3

On the map: LLM reasoning → Prompting and chain-of-thought reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting improves reasoning but often produces long and redundant traces that substantially increase inference cost. We present SyncThink, a training-free and plug-and-play decoding method that reduces CoT overhead without modifying model weights. We find that answer tokens attend weakly to early reasoning and instead focus on the special token "/think", indicating an information bottleneck. Building on this observation, SyncThink monitors the model's own reasoning-transition signal and terminates reasoning. Experiments on GSM8K, MMLU, GPQA, and BBH across three DeepSeek-R1 distilled models show that SyncThink achieves 62.00 percent average Top-1 accuracy using 656 generated tokens and 28.68 s latency, compared to 61.22 percent, 2141 tokens, and 92.01 s for full CoT decoding. On long-horizon tasks such as GPQA, SyncThink can further yield up to +8.1 absolute accuracy by preventing over-thinking.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Prompting and chain-of-thought reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 20 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jan 2026.

Builds on

20 of 25 references.

Closest ancestors · 4

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Answer Convergence as a Signal for Early Stopping in Reasoning3 Jun
  2. 2025Sketch-of-Thought: Efficient LLM Reasoning with Adaptive Cognitive-Inspired Sketching7 Mar
  3. 2025Chain of Draft: Thinking Faster by Writing Less25 Feb
  4. 2022Challenging BIG-Bench Tasks and Whether Chain-of-Thought Can Solve Them17 Oct

Other references · 16

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  3. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  4. 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,598
  5. 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,748
  6. 2023Efficient Streaming Language Models with Attention Sinkscited by 2,115
  7. 2024Do NOT Think That Much for 2+3=? On the Overthinking of o1-Like LLMscited by 564
  8. 2023Label Words are Anchors: An Information Flow Perspective for Understanding In-Context Learningcited by 235
  9. 2025Dynamic Early Exit in Reasoning Modelscited by 217
  10. 2025A Survey of Efficient Reasoning for Large Reasoning Models: Language, Multimodality, and Beyondcited by 131
  11. 2025Optimizing Test-Time Compute via Meta Reinforcement Fine-Tuningcited by 121
  12. 2024Forest-of-Thought: Scaling Test-Time Compute for Enhancing LLM Reasoningcited by 110
4 more
  1. 2025LightThinker: Thinking Step-by-Step Compressioncited by 104
  2. 2024Self-Contrast: Better Reflection Through Inconsistent Solving Perspectivescited by 71
  3. 2024Multi-Agent Sampling: Scaling Inference Compute for Data Synthesis with Tree Search-Based Agentic Collaborationcited by 8
  4. 2025Will Pre-Training Ever End? A First Step Toward Next-Generation Foundation MLLMs via Self-Improving Systematic Cognitioncited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025ThinkLess: A Training-Free Inference-Efficient Method for Reducing Reasoning Redundancy
  2. 2026</think> Doesn't Stop Reasoning: Analysis of Spurious CoT Termination
  3. 2025ThinkBrake: Efficient Reasoning via Log-Probability Margin Guided Decoding
  4. 2026TERMINATOR: Learning Optimal Exit Points for Early Stopping in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning
  5. 2025Logit-Entropy Adaptive Stopping Heuristic for Efficient Chain-of-Thought Reasoning
  6. 2025Deep Hidden Cognition Facilitates Reliable Chain-of-Thought Reasoning
  7. 2025Fractured Chain-of-Thought Reasoning
  8. 2025Early Stopping Chain-of-thoughts in Large Language Models