Physics-Informed Gaussian Process Regression for the Constitutive Modeling of Concrete: A Data-Driven Improvement to Phenomenological Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Understanding and modeling the constitutive behavior of concrete is crucial for civil and defense applications, yet widely used phenomenological models such as Karagozian & Case concrete (KCC) model depend on empirically calibrated failure surfaces that lack flexibility in model form and associated uncertainty quantification. This work develops a physics-informed framework that retains the modular elastoplastic structure of KCC model while replacing its empirical failure surface with a constrained Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) surrogate that can be learned directly from experimentally accessible observables. Triaxial compression data under varying confinement levels are used for training, and the surrogate is then evaluated at confinement levels not included in the training set to assess its generalization capability. Results show that an unconstrained GPR interpolates well near training conditions but deteriorates and violates essential physical constraints under extrapolation, even when augmented with simulated data. In contrast, a physics-informed GPR that incorporates derivative-based constraints aligned with known material behavior yields markedly better accuracy and reliability, including at higher confinement levels beyond the training range. Probabilistic enforcement of these constraints also reduces predictive variance, producing tighter confidence intervals in data-scarce regimes. Overall, the proposed approach delivers a robust, uncertainty-aware surrogate that improves generalization and streamlines calibration without sacrificing the interpretability and numerical efficiency of the KCC model, offering a practical path toward an improved constitutive models for concrete.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jan 2026.
Builds on
14 of 53 references.
References · 14
- 2020A Survey of Constrained Gaussian Process Regression: Approaches and Implementation Challengescited by 51
- 2024A review on data-driven constitutive laws for solidscited by 35
- 2021On physics-informed data-driven isotropic and anisotropic constitutive models through probabilistic machine learning and space-filling samplingcited by 24
- 2021Local approximate Gaussian process regression for data-driven constitutive laws: Development and comparison with neural networkscited by 17
- 2022Constitutive model characterization and discovery using physics-informed deep learningcited by 17
- 2024Physics-constrained polynomial chaos expansion for scientific machine learning and uncertainty quantificationcited by 17
- 2022Modular machine learning-based elastoplasticity: generalization in the context of limited datacited by 16
- 2023Physics-Informed Polynomial Chaos Expansionscited by 15
- 2019Tensor Basis Gaussian Process Models of Hyperelastic Materialscited by 11
- 2020Nonnegativity-Enforced Gaussian Process Regressioncited by 10
- 2023Discovering interpretable elastoplasticity models via the neural polynomial method enabled symbolic regressionscited by 10
- 2023Stress representations for tensor basis neural networks: alternative formulations to Finger-Rivlin-Ericksencited by 9
Built on by
Not cited yet.