Faithfulness Evaluation for Decoder-only LLM Attributions with Controlled Retained Information
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly evaluated with input attribution methods, yet comparing such explanations remains challenging. Existing soft-perturbation faithfulness metrics, such as Soft-NC and Soft-NS, can conflate attribution quality with the number of words retained during perturbation: attribution methods with larger average scores may keep more words and therefore obtain inflated scores. To address this issue, we propose π-Soft-NC and π-Soft-NS, an evaluation framework that compares attribution methods under the same expected retaining probability, thus controlling the number of retained words. We further introduce Grad-ELLM, a gradient-based attribution method tailored to autoregressive decoder-only LLMs, which combines gradient-derived channel importance with attention-derived token importance at each decoding step. Experiments on classification and open-generation tasks with Llama and Mistral show that Grad-ELLM achieves strong comprehensiveness-oriented faithfulness under π-Soft-NC, while there is no dominant method under π-Soft-NS. Our evaluation metric serves as a rigorous framework to compare XAI methods for LLMs, which will support progress in the field.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jan 2026.
Builds on
20 of 40 references.
References · 20
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
- 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
- 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,454
- 2019Attention is not Explanationcited by 916
- 2018RISE: Randomized Input Sampling for Explanation of Black-box Modelscited by 825
- 2019ERASER: A Benchmark to Evaluate Rationalized NLP Modelscited by 523
- 2015Evaluating the visualization of what a Deep Neural Network has learnedcited by 416
- 2019Is Attention Interpretable?cited by 387
8 more
- 2016Rationalizing Neural Predictionscited by 281
- 2020The elephant in the interpretability room: Why use attention as explanation when we have saliency methods?cited by 122
- 2023Inseq: An Interpretability Toolkit for Sequence Generation Modelscited by 78
- 2023Quantifying Context Mixing in Transformerscited by 43
- 2022Grad-SAM: Explaining Transformers via Gradient Self-Attention Mapscited by 42
- 2021On the Sensitivity and Stability of Model Interpretations in NLPcited by 30
- 2021TellMeWhy: A Dataset for Answering Why-Questions in Narrativescited by 27
- 2025Grad-ECLIP: Gradient-based Visual and Textual Explanations for CLIPcited by 7
Built on by
Not cited yet.