mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Faithfulness Evaluation for Decoder-only LLM Attributions with Controlled Retained Information

arXiv 2601.03089 ↗First posted 6 Jan 2026cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly evaluated with input attribution methods, yet comparing such explanations remains challenging. Existing soft-perturbation faithfulness metrics, such as Soft-NC and Soft-NS, can conflate attribution quality with the number of words retained during perturbation: attribution methods with larger average scores may keep more words and therefore obtain inflated scores. To address this issue, we propose π-Soft-NC and π-Soft-NS, an evaluation framework that compares attribution methods under the same expected retaining probability, thus controlling the number of retained words. We further introduce Grad-ELLM, a gradient-based attribution method tailored to autoregressive decoder-only LLMs, which combines gradient-derived channel importance with attention-derived token importance at each decoding step. Experiments on classification and open-generation tasks with Llama and Mistral show that Grad-ELLM achieves strong comprehensiveness-oriented faithfulness under π-Soft-NC, while there is no dominant method under π-Soft-NS. Our evaluation metric serves as a rigorous framework to compare XAI methods for LLMs, which will support progress in the field.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jan 2026.

Builds on

20 of 40 references.

References · 20

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  3. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  4. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  5. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
  6. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
  7. 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,454
  8. 2019Attention is not Explanationcited by 916
  9. 2018RISE: Randomized Input Sampling for Explanation of Black-box Modelscited by 825
  10. 2019ERASER: A Benchmark to Evaluate Rationalized NLP Modelscited by 523
  11. 2015Evaluating the visualization of what a Deep Neural Network has learnedcited by 416
  12. 2019Is Attention Interpretable?cited by 387
8 more
  1. 2016Rationalizing Neural Predictionscited by 281
  2. 2020The elephant in the interpretability room: Why use attention as explanation when we have saliency methods?cited by 122
  3. 2023Inseq: An Interpretability Toolkit for Sequence Generation Modelscited by 78
  4. 2023Quantifying Context Mixing in Transformerscited by 43
  5. 2022Grad-SAM: Explaining Transformers via Gradient Self-Attention Mapscited by 42
  6. 2021On the Sensitivity and Stability of Model Interpretations in NLPcited by 30
  7. 2021TellMeWhy: A Dataset for Answering Why-Questions in Narrativescited by 27
  8. 2025Grad-ECLIP: Gradient-based Visual and Textual Explanations for CLIPcited by 7

Built on by

Not cited yet.