Revisiting Forest Proximities via Sparse Leaf-Incidence Kernels
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Decision forests induce supervised similarities through the partition structure of their trees. Yet forest proximity computation is still often treated as a quadratic operation in the number of samples, which limits scalability and restricts broader use in kernel and representation-learning pipelines. We introduce a unified view of leaf-collision forest proximities through a class of Separable Weighted Leaf-Collision (SWLC) kernels, showing that most existing proximities differ only in their weighting scheme while sharing a common sparse leaf-incidence structure. This yields an explicit leaf-space representation that clarifies their kernel interpretation and leads to an exact finite-sample sparse factorization of the proximity matrix, avoiding an explicit all-pairs comparison and reducing computation to sparse linear algebra over leaf collisions. We implement this framework in a memory-efficient Python library and show, both theoretically and empirically, that exact kernel computation scales near-linearly in time and memory under standard forest regimes. Benchmarks verify the predicted scaling behavior in practice across datasets, proximity definitions, and forest settings, and show that the resulting sparse leaf-space representation can also be used directly for fast task-aware embedding.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jan 2026.
Builds on
21 of 60 references.
References · 21
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
- 2021MedMNIST v2 -- A large-scale lightweight benchmark for 2D and 3D biomedical image classificationcited by 682
- 2014OpenML: networked science in machine learningcited by 523
- 2020MedMNIST Classification Decathlon: A Lightweight AutoML Benchmark for Medical Image Analysiscited by 206
- 2014Understanding Random Forests: From Theory to Practicecited by 57
- 2020The Tree Ensemble Layer: Differentiability meets Conditional Computationcited by 57
- 2022Geometry- and Accuracy-Preserving Random Forest Proximitiescited by 24
- 2014The Random Forest Kernel and other kernels for big data from random partitionscited by 18
- 2022Learning with Asymmetric Kernels: Least Squares and Feature Interpretationcited by 11
- 2020A Novel Random Forest Dissimilarity Measure for Multi-View Learningcited by 7
- 2025Random Forest Autoencoders for Guided Representation Learningcited by 4
9 more
- 2018Explicating feature contribution using Random Forest proximity distancescited by 3
- 2018Making Sense of Random Forest Probabilities: a Kernel Perspectivecited by 3
- 2023Supervised Manifold Learning via Random Forest Geometry-Preserving Proximitiescited by 3
- 2023Enhanced Local Explainability and Trust Scores with Random Forest Proximitiescited by 3
- 2024Forest Proximities for Time Seriescited by 3
- 2024Random Forest-Supervised Manifold Alignmentcited by 3
- 2025Autoencoding Random Forestscited by 3
- 2024Learning in Feature Spaces via Coupled Covariances: Asymmetric Kernel SVD and Nystr"om methodcited by 2
- 2025RFX: High-Performance Random Forests with GPU Acceleration and QLORA Compressioncited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.