mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Don't Mind the Gaps: Implicit Neural Representations for Resolution-Agnostic Retinal OCT Analysis

arXiv 2601.02447 ↗First posted 5 Jan 2026cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Routine clinical imaging of the retina using optical coherence tomography (OCT) is performed with large slice spacing, resulting in highly anisotropic images and a sparsely scanned retina. Most learning-based methods circumvent the problems arising from the anisotropy by using 2D approaches rather than performing volumetric analyses. These approaches inherently bear the risk of generating inconsistent results for neighboring B-scans. For example, 2D retinal layer segmentations can have irregular surfaces in 3D. Furthermore, the typically used convolutional neural networks are bound to the resolution of the training data, which prevents their usage for images acquired with a different imaging protocol. Implicit neural representations (INRs) have recently emerged as a tool to store voxelized data as a continuous representation. Using coordinates as input, INRs are resolution-agnostic, which allows them to be applied to anisotropic data. In this paper, we propose two frameworks that make use of this characteristic of INRs for dense 3D analyses of retinal OCT volumes. 1) We perform inter-B-scan interpolation by incorporating additional information from en-face modalities, that help retain relevant structures between B-scans. 2) We create a resolution-agnostic retinal atlas that enables general analysis without strict requirements for the data. Both methods leverage generalizable INRs, improving retinal shape representation through population-based training and allowing predictions for unseen cases. Our resolution-independent frameworks facilitate the analysis of OCT images with large B-scan distances, opening up possibilities for the volumetric evaluation of retinal structures and pathologies.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jan 2026.

Builds on

18 of 49 references.

References · 18

  1. 2019DeepSDF: Learning Continuous Signed Distance Functions for Shape Representationcited by 2,682
  2. 2020Implicit Neural Representations with Periodic Activation Functionscited by 2,214
  3. 2018Learning Implicit Fields for Generative Shape Modelingcited by 1,060
  4. 2023WIRE: Wavelet Implicit Neural Representationscited by 220
  5. 2022From data to functa: Your data point is a function and you can treat it like onecited by 183
  6. 2018Distribution Matching Losses Can Hallucinate Features in Medical Image Translationcited by 99
  7. 2021An Arbitrary Scale Super-Resolution Approach for 3D MR Images via Implicit Neural Representationcited by 47
  8. 2022Generalizable Implicit Neural Representations via Instance Pattern Composerscited by 38
  9. 2023Single-subject Multi-contrast MRI Super-resolution via Implicit Neural Representationscited by 32
  10. 2023INCODE: Implicit Neural Conditioning with Prior Knowledge Embeddingscited by 31
  11. 2023NISF: Neural Implicit Segmentation Functionscited by 29
  12. 2018Deep Learning based Retinal OCT Segmentationcited by 16
6 more
  1. 2024CycleINR: Cycle Implicit Neural Representation for Arbitrary-Scale Volumetric Super-Resolution of Medical Datacited by 15
  2. 2024CINA: Conditional Implicit Neural Atlas for Spatio-Temporal Representation of Fetal Brainscited by 14
  3. 2023Robust deformable image registration using cycle-consistent implicit representationscited by 13
  4. 2023textttNePhi: Neural Deformation Fields for Approximately Diffeomorphic Medical Image Registrationcited by 8
  5. 2023Simultaneous Alignment and Surface Regression Using Hybrid 2D-3D Networks for 3D Coherent Layer Segmentation of Retinal OCT Images with Full and Sparse Annotationscited by 7
  6. 2024Limited-View Photoacoustic Imaging Reconstruction Via High-quality Self-supervised Neural Representationcited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.