Jenius Agent: Towards Experience-Driven Accuracy Optimization in Real-World Scenarios
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Tool learning and function calling
Abstract (arXiv)
As agent systems powered by large language models (LLMs) advance, improving performance in context understanding, tool usage, and long-horizon execution has become critical. However, existing agent frameworks and benchmarks provide limited visibility into execution-level behavior, making failures in tool invocation, state tracking, and context management difficult to diagnose. This paper presents Jenius-Agent, a system-level agent framework grounded in real-world deployment experience. It integrates adaptive prompt generation, context-aware tool orchestration, and layered memory mechanism to stabilize execution and improve robustness in long-horizon, tool-augmented tasks. Beyond system design, we introduce an evaluation methodology that jointly measures procedural fidelity, semantic correctness, and efficiency. This framework makes agent behavior observable as a structured execution process and enables systematic analysis of failure modes not captured by output-only metrics. Experiments on Jenius-bench show substantial improvements in task completion rate, with up to a 35 percent relative gain over the base agent, along with reduced token consumption, response latency, and tool invocation failures. The framework is already deployed in Jenius ({https://www.jenius.cn}), providing a lightweight and scalable solution for robust, protocol-compatible autonomous agents.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Tool learning and function calling, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 18 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jan 2026.
Builds on
18 of 28 references.
Closest ancestors · 3
Same direction, newest first
- 2024APIGen: Automated Pipeline for Generating Verifiable and Diverse Function-Calling Datasets26 Jun
- 2023Tool Learning with Foundation Models17 Apr
- 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Tools9 Feb
Other references · 15
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
- 2023A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agentscited by 2,242
- 2023AutoGen: Enabling Next-Gen LLM Applications via Multi-Agent Conversationcited by 1,988
- 2023The Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Surveycited by 1,439
- 2025Qwen3 Embedding: Advancing Text Embedding and Reranking Through Foundation Modelscited by 1,261
- 2025Why Do Multi-Agent LLM Systems Fail?cited by 604
- 2025Model Context Protocol (MCP): Landscape, Security Threats, and Future Research Directionscited by 265
- 2023Auto-GPT for Online Decision Making: Benchmarks and Additional Opinionscited by 255
- 2025Agentic Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Survey on Agentic RAGcited by 249
- 2024The Landscape of Emerging AI Agent Architectures for Reasoning, Planning, and Tool Calling: A Surveycited by 168
- 2025Multi-Agent Design: Optimizing Agents with Better Prompts and Topologiescited by 113
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026ChromaFlow: A Negative Ablation Study of Orchestration Overhead in Tool-Augmented Agent Evaluation
- 2026AgentProcessBench: Diagnosing Step-Level Process Quality in Tool-Using Agents
- 2026The Evolution of Tool Use in LLM Agents: From Single-Tool Call to Multi-Tool Orchestration
- 2026Control Under Compression: Reliability Frontiers for Tool-Using Agents
- 2025Unifying Dynamic Tool Creation and Cross-Task Experience Sharing through Cognitive Memory Architecture
- 2026Verified Tool Calls Improve LLM Agent Reliability Under Non-Atomic Failures
- 2026Action-Space Shaping for LLM Agents: Measuring and Mitigating Tool-Schema Bias
- 2025Multi-Mission Tool Bench: Assessing the Robustness of LLM based Agents through Related and Dynamic Missions