Beyond Gemini-3-Pro: Revisiting LLM Routing and Aggregation at Scale
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large Language Models (LLMs) have rapidly advanced, with Gemini-3-Pro setting a new performance milestone. In this work, we explore collective intelligence as an alternative to monolithic scaling, and demonstrate that open-source LLMs' collaboration can surpass Gemini-3-Pro. We first revisit LLM routing and aggregation at scale and identify three key bottlenecks: (1) current train-free routers are limited by a query-based paradigm focusing solely on textual similarity; (2) recent aggregation methods remain largely static, failing to select appropriate aggregators for different tasks;(3) the complementarity of routing and aggregation remains underutilized. To address these problems, we introduce JiSi, a novel framework designed to release the full potential of LLMs' collaboration through three innovations: (1) Query-Response Mixed Routing capturing both semantic information and problem difficulty; (2) Support-Set-based Aggregator Selection jointly evaluating the aggregation and domain capacity of aggregators; (3) Adaptive Routing-Aggregation Switch dynamically leveraging the advantages of routing and aggregation. Comprehensive experiments on nine benchmarks demonstrate that JiSi can surpass Gemini-3-Pro with only 47% costs by orchestrating ten open-source LLMs, while outperforming mainstream baselines. It suggests that collective intelligence represents a novel path towards Artificial General Intelligence (AGI).
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jan 2026.
Builds on
24 of 34 references.
References · 24
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
- 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,193
- 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,748
- 2024LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Codecited by 1,906
- 2024MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmarkcited by 1,758
- 2023Towards General Text Embeddings with Multi-stage Contrastive Learningcited by 705
- 2024Mixture-of-Agents Enhances Large Language Model Capabilitiescited by 420
- 2024Measuring short-form factuality in large language modelscited by 345
- 2023Universal Self-Consistency for Large Language Model Generationcited by 198
- 2024More Agents Is All You Needcited by 174
12 more
- 2023Large Language Model Routing with Benchmark Datasetscited by 166
- 2024GraphRouter: A Graph-based Router for LLM Selectionscited by 154
- 2023Routing to the Expert: Efficient Reward-guided Ensemble of Large Language Modelscited by 141
- 2024Are Your LLMs Capable of Stable Reasoning?cited by 65
- 2025Rethinking Mixture-of-Agents: Is Mixing Different Large Language Models Beneficial?cited by 52
- 2024EmbedLLM: Learning Compact Representations of Large Language Modelscited by 46
- 2025The Avengers: A Simple Recipe for Uniting Smaller Language Models to Challenge Proprietary Giantscited by 37
- 2025Capability Instruction Tuning: A New Paradigm for Dynamic LLM Routingcited by 25
- 2025Probing Scientific General Intelligence of LLMs with Scientist-Aligned Workflowscited by 25
- 2025Skill-Based Mixture-of-Experts: Adaptive Routing for Heterogeneous Reasoning via Inferred Skillscited by 24
- 2025Do We Truly Need So Many Samples? Multi-LLM Repeated Sampling Efficiently Scales Test-Time Computecited by 20
- 2025This Is Your Doge, If It Please You: Exploring Deception and Robustness in Mixture of LLMscited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.