Physically-Constrained Autoencoder-Assisted Bayesian Optimization for Refinement of High-Dimensional Defect-Sensitive Single Crystalline Structure
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Physical properties and functionalities of materials are dictated by global crystal structures as well as local defects. To establish a structure-property relationship, not only the crystallographic symmetry but also quantitative knowledge about defects are required. Here we present a hybrid Machine Learning framework that integrates a physically-constrained variational-autoencoder (pcVAE) with different Bayesian Optimization (BO) methods to systematically accelerate and improve crystal structure refinement with resolution of defects. We chose the pyrochlore structured Ho2Ti2O7 as a model system and employed the GSAS2 package for benchmarking crystallographic parameters from Rietveld refinement. However, the function space of these material systems is highly nonlinear, which limits optimizers like traditional Rietveld refinement, into trapping at local minima. Also, these naive methods don't provide an extensive learning about the overall function space, which is essential for large space, large time consuming explorations to identify various potential regions of interest. Thus, we present the approach of exploring the high Dimensional structure parameters of defect sensitive systems via pretrained pcVAE assisted BO and Sparse Axis Aligned BO. The pcVAE projects high-Dimensional diffraction data consisting of thousands of independently measured diffraction orders into a lowD latent space while enforcing scaling invariance and physical relevance. Then via BO methods, we aim to minimize the L2 norm based chisq errors in the real and latent spaces separately between experimental and simulated diffraction patterns, thereby steering the refinement towards potential optimum crystal structure parameters. We investigated and compared the results among different pcVAE assisted BO, non pcVAE assisted BO, and Rietveld refinement.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 75 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Dec 2025.
Builds on
12 of 75 references.
References · 12
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2018GPyTorch: Blackbox Matrix-Matrix Gaussian Process Inference with GPU Accelerationcited by 609
- 2013Bayesian Optimization in a Billion Dimensions via Random Embeddingscited by 182
- 2021High-Dimensional Bayesian Optimization with Sparse Axis-Aligned Subspacescited by 141
- 2018BOCK : Bayesian Optimization with Cylindrical Kernelscited by 65
- 2021Improving black-box optimization in VAE latent space using decoder uncertaintycited by 51
- 2020Autonomous Materials Discovery Driven by Gaussian Process Regression with Inhomogeneous Measurement Noise and Anisotropic Kernelscited by 17
- 2024Ab Initio Structure Solutions from Nanocrystalline Powder Diffraction Datacited by 12
- 2018How Robust are Deep Neural Networks?cited by 10
- 2022Optimizing Training Trajectories in Variational Autoencoders via Latent Bayesian Optimization Approachcited by 7
- 2023Combining Variational Autoencoders and Physical Bias for Improved Microscopy Data Analysiscited by 5
- 2025Deep Generative Learning of Magnetic Frustration in Artificial Spin Ice from Magnetic Force Microscopy Imagescited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.