mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Secure, Verifiable, and Scalable Multi-Client Data Sharing via Consensus-Based Privacy-Preserving Data Distribution

arXiv 2601.00418 ↗First posted 1 Jan 2026cs.CR cs.DC cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We propose the Consensus-Based Privacy-Preserving Data Distribution (CPPDD) framework, a lightweight and post-setup autonomous protocol for secure multi-client data aggregation. The framework enforces unanimous-release confidentiality through a dual-layer protection mechanism that combines per-client affine masking with priority-driven sequential consensus locking. Decentralized integrity is verified via step (sigma_S) and data (sigma_D) checksums, facilitating autonomous malicious deviation detection and atomic abort without requiring persistent coordination. The design supports scalar, vector, and matrix payloads with O(N*D) computation and communication complexity, optional edge-server offloading, and resistance to collusion under N-1 corruptions. Formal analysis proves correctness, Consensus-Dependent Integrity and Fairness (CDIF) with overwhelming-probability abort on deviation, and IND-CPA security assuming a pseudorandom function family. Empirical evaluations on MNIST-derived vectors demonstrate linear scalability up to N = 500 with sub-millisecond per-client computation times. The framework achieves 100% malicious deviation detection, exact data recovery, and three-to-four orders of magnitude lower FLOPs compared to MPC and HE baselines. CPPDD enables atomic collaboration in secure voting, consortium federated learning, blockchain escrows, and geo-information capacity building, addressing critical gaps in scalability, trust minimization, and verifiable multi-party computation for regulated and resource-constrained environments.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jan 2026.

Builds on

9 of 38 references.

References · 9

  1. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
  2. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,728
  3. 2019Deep Leakage from Gradientscited by 1,021
  4. 2019Federated Learning with Differential Privacy: Algorithms and Performance Analysiscited by 536
  5. 2019Local Model Poisoning Attacks to Byzantine-Robust Federated Learningcited by 493
  6. 2016Practical Secure Aggregation for Federated Learning on User-Held Datacited by 178
  7. 2018A generic framework for privacy preserving deep learningcited by 103
  8. 2025Optimal Privacy-Preserving Distributed Median Consensuscited by 1
  9. 2025FedBKD: Distilled Federated Learning to Embrace Gerneralization and Personalization on Non-IID Datacited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.