Secure, Verifiable, and Scalable Multi-Client Data Sharing via Consensus-Based Privacy-Preserving Data Distribution
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We propose the Consensus-Based Privacy-Preserving Data Distribution (CPPDD) framework, a lightweight and post-setup autonomous protocol for secure multi-client data aggregation. The framework enforces unanimous-release confidentiality through a dual-layer protection mechanism that combines per-client affine masking with priority-driven sequential consensus locking. Decentralized integrity is verified via step (sigma_S) and data (sigma_D) checksums, facilitating autonomous malicious deviation detection and atomic abort without requiring persistent coordination. The design supports scalar, vector, and matrix payloads with O(N*D) computation and communication complexity, optional edge-server offloading, and resistance to collusion under N-1 corruptions. Formal analysis proves correctness, Consensus-Dependent Integrity and Fairness (CDIF) with overwhelming-probability abort on deviation, and IND-CPA security assuming a pseudorandom function family. Empirical evaluations on MNIST-derived vectors demonstrate linear scalability up to N = 500 with sub-millisecond per-client computation times. The framework achieves 100% malicious deviation detection, exact data recovery, and three-to-four orders of magnitude lower FLOPs compared to MPC and HE baselines. CPPDD enables atomic collaboration in secure voting, consortium federated learning, blockchain escrows, and geo-information capacity building, addressing critical gaps in scalability, trust minimization, and verifiable multi-party computation for regulated and resource-constrained environments.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jan 2026.
Builds on
9 of 38 references.
References · 9
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,728
- 2019Deep Leakage from Gradientscited by 1,021
- 2019Federated Learning with Differential Privacy: Algorithms and Performance Analysiscited by 536
- 2019Local Model Poisoning Attacks to Byzantine-Robust Federated Learningcited by 493
- 2016Practical Secure Aggregation for Federated Learning on User-Held Datacited by 178
- 2018A generic framework for privacy preserving deep learningcited by 103
- 2025Optimal Privacy-Preserving Distributed Median Consensuscited by 1
- 2025FedBKD: Distilled Federated Learning to Embrace Gerneralization and Personalization on Non-IID Datacited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.