mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The Generative AI Paradox: GenAI and the Erosion of Trust, the Corrosion of Information Verification, and the Demise of Truth

arXiv 2601.00306 ↗First posted 1 Jan 2026cs.CY cs.AI cs.HCcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Generative AI (GenAI) now produces text, images, audio, and video that can be perceptually convincing at scale and at negligible marginal cost. While public debate often frames the associated harms as "deepfakes" or incremental extensions of misinformation and fraud, this view misses a broader socio-technical shift: GenAI enables synthetic realities; coherent, interactive, and potentially personalized information environments in which content, identity, and social interaction are jointly manufactured and mutually reinforcing. We argue that the most consequential risk is not merely the production of isolated synthetic artifacts, but the progressive erosion of shared epistemic ground and institutional verification practices as synthetic content, synthetic identity, and synthetic interaction become easy to generate and hard to audit. This paper (i) formalizes synthetic reality as a layered stack (content, identity, interaction, institutions), (ii) expands a taxonomy of GenAI harms spanning personal, economic, informational, and socio-technical risks, (iii) articulates the qualitative shifts introduced by GenAI (cost collapse, throughput, customization, micro-segmentation, provenance gaps, and trust erosion), and (iv) synthesizes recent risk realizations (2023-2025) into a compact case bank illustrating how these mechanisms manifest in fraud, elections, harassment, documentation, and supply-chain compromise. We then propose a mitigation stack that treats provenance infrastructure, platform governance, institutional workflow redesign, and public resilience as complementary rather than substitutable, and outline a research agenda focused on measuring epistemic security. We conclude with the Generative AI Paradox: as synthetic media becomes ubiquitous, societies may rationally discount digital evidence altogether.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jan 2026.

Builds on

14 of 38 references.

References · 14

  1. 2024Sleeper Agents: Training Deceptive LLMs that Persist Through Safety Trainingcited by 478
  2. 2023Factuality Challenges in the Era of Large Language Modelscited by 125
  3. 2023Fairness And Bias in Artificial Intelligence: A Brief Survey of Sources, Impacts, And Mitigation Strategiescited by 83
  4. 2023GenAI Against Humanity: Nefarious Applications of Generative Artificial Intelligence and Large Language Modelscited by 40
  5. 2024Data Poisoning for In-context Learningcited by 21
  6. 2023Examining the Impact of Provenance-Enabled Media on Trust and Accuracy Perceptionscited by 9
  7. 2024Auditing Political Exposure Bias: Algorithmic Amplification on Twitter/X During the 2024 U.S. Presidential Electioncited by 8
  8. 2024Exposing Cross-Platform Coordinated Inauthentic Activity in the Run-Up to the 2024 U.S. Electioncited by 7
  9. 2025Synthetic Politics: Prevalence, Spreaders, and Emotional Reception of AI-Generated Political Images on Xcited by 5
  10. 2023Disinformation 2.0 in the Age of AI: A Cybersecurity Perspectivecited by 4
  11. 2025Coordinated Inauthentic Behavior on TikTok: Challenges and Opportunities for Detection in a Video-First Ecosystemcited by 4
  12. 2025Community Moderation and the New Epistemology of Fact Checking on Social Mediacited by 4
2 more
  1. 2024Charting the Landscape of Nefarious Uses of Generative Artificial Intelligence for Online Election Interferencecited by 3
  2. 2024Uncovering Coordinated Cross-Platform Information Operations Threatening the Integrity of the 2024 U.S. Presidential Election Online Discussioncited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.

4 papers.