mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Limits of quantum generative models with classical sampling hardness

arXiv 2512.24801 ↗First posted 31 Dec 2025quant-ph cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Sampling tasks have been successful in establishing quantum advantages both in theory and experiments. This has fueled the use of quantum computers for generative modeling to create samples following the probability distribution underlying a given dataset. In particular, the potential to build generative models on classically hard distributions would immediately preclude classical simulability, due to theoretical separations. In this work, we study quantum generative models from the perspective of output distributions, showing that models that anticoncentrate are not trainable on average, including those exhibiting quantum advantage. In contrast, models outputting data from sparse distributions can be trained. We consider special cases to enhance trainability, and observe that this opens the path for classical algorithms for surrogate sampling. This observed trade-off is linked to verification of quantum processes. We conclude that quantum advantage can still be found in generative models, although its source must be distinct from anticoncentration.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Dec 2025.

Builds on

15 of 65 references.

References · 15

  1. 2018Barren plateaus in quantum neural network training landscapescited by 624
  2. 2020The Pitfalls of Simplicity Bias in Neural Networkscited by 349
  3. 2020Power of data in quantum machine learningcited by 336
  4. 2020A rigorous and robust quantum speed-up in supervised machine learningcited by 270
  5. 2024Barren Plateaus in Variational Quantum Computingcited by 130
  6. 2023Does provable absence of barren plateaus imply classical simulability?cited by 78
  7. 2019The Born Supremacy: Quantum Advantage and Training of an Ising Born Machinecited by 75
  8. 2020On the Quantum versus Classical Learnability of Discrete Distributionscited by 57
  9. 2022Classical surrogates for quantum learning modelscited by 39
  10. 2023Trainability barriers and opportunities in quantum generative modelingcited by 35
  11. 2023Shadows of quantum machine learningcited by 31
  12. 2024On the relation between trainability and dequantization of variational quantum learning modelscited by 24
3 more
  1. 2023Query lower bounds for log-concave samplingcited by 12
  2. 2022Protocols for classically training quantum generative models on probability distributionscited by 4
  3. 2024Provable quantum speedups for computing persistence in topological data analysiscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.