Constraint Breeds Generalization: Temporal Dynamics as an Inductive Bias
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Conventional deep learning prioritizes unconstrained optimization, yet biological systems operate under strict metabolic constraints. We propose that these physical constraints shape dynamics to function not as limitations, but as a temporal inductive bias that breeds generalization. Through a phase-space analysis of signal propagation, we reveal a fundamental asymmetry: expansive dynamics amplify noise, whereas proper dissipative dynamics compress phase space that aligns with the network's spectral bias, compelling the abstraction of invariant features. This condition can be imposed externally via input encoding, or intrinsically through the network's own temporal dynamics. Both pathways require architectures capable of temporal integration and proper constraints to decode induced invariants, whereas static architectures fail to capitalize on temporal structure. Through comprehensive evaluations across supervised classification, unsupervised reconstruction, and zero-shot reinforcement learning, we demonstrate that a critical "transition" regime maximizes generalization capability. These findings establish dynamical constraints as a distinct class of inductive bias, suggesting that robust AI development requires not only scaling and removing limitations, but computationally mastering the temporal characteristics that naturally promote generalization.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Dec 2025.
Builds on
26 of 62 references.
References · 26
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
- 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,579
- 2017Domain Randomization for Transferring Deep Neural Networks from Simulation to the Real Worldcited by 1,401
- 2018Relational inductive biases, deep learning, and graph networkscited by 1,341
- 2018On the Spectral Bias of Neural Networkscited by 1,321
- 2014How transferable are features in deep neural networks?cited by 1,216
- 2017Sim-to-Real Transfer of Robotic Control with Dynamics Randomizationcited by 616
- 2017Exploring Generalization in Deep Learningcited by 595
- 2020Inductive Biases for Deep Learning of Higher-Level Cognitioncited by 273
- 2021Training Spiking Neural Networks Using Lessons From Deep Learningcited by 251
14 more
- 2021A Survey of Zero-shot Generalisation in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 164
- 2020The Hardware Lotterycited by 160
- 2018Assessing Generalization in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 132
- 2025Why Diffusion Models Don't Memorize: The Role of Implicit Dynamical Regularization in Trainingcited by 78
- 2022The Effects of Regularization and Data Augmentation are Class Dependentcited by 67
- 2018Data augmentation instead of explicit regularizationcited by 62
- 2022Thermodynamics-informed graph neural networkscited by 31
- 2022On the Strong Correlation Between Model Invariance and Generalizationcited by 23
- 2020Dissipative Deep Neural Dynamical Systemscited by 12
- 2022On the Intrinsic Structures of Spiking Neural Networkscited by 4
- 2024The Role of Temporal Hierarchy in Spiking Neural Networkscited by 4
- 2020Finite Meta-Dynamic Neurons in Spiking Neural Networks for Spatio-temporal Learningcited by 2
- 2025Bridging Brains and Machines: A Unified Frontier in Neuroscience, Artificial Intelligence, and Neuromorphic Systemscited by 2
- 2025Dynamical Alignment: A Principle for Adaptive Neural Computationcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.