mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Multilingual Hidden Prompt Injection Attacks on LLM-Based Academic Reviewing

arXiv 2512.23684 ↗First posted 29 Dec 2025cs.CL cs.AIcited by 2

On the map: LLM safety and security → Prompt injection and agent security

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly considered for use in high-impact workflows, including academic peer review. However, LLMs are vulnerable to document-level hidden prompt injection attacks. In this work, we construct a dataset of approximately 500 real academic papers accepted to ICML and evaluate the effect of embedding hidden adversarial prompts within these documents. Each paper is injected with semantically equivalent instructions in four different languages and reviewed using an LLM. We find that prompt injection induces substantial changes in review scores and accept/reject decisions for English, Japanese, and Chinese injections, while Arabic injections produce little to no effect. These results highlight the susceptibility of LLM-based reviewing systems to document-level prompt injection and reveal notable differences in vulnerability across languages.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Prompt injection and agent security, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 6 of its 13 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Dec 2025.

Builds on

6 of 13 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023Prompt Injection attack against LLM-integrated Applications8 Jun
  2. 2023Not what you've signed up for: Compromising Real-World LLM-Integrated Applications with Indirect Prompt Injection23 Feb

Other references · 4

  1. 2023Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?cited by 1,651
  2. 2019Cross-lingual Language Model Pretrainingcited by 1,090
  3. 2021The Values Encoded in Machine Learning Researchcited by 172
  4. 2024An Efficient Approach for Studying Cross-Lingual Transfer in Multilingual Language Modelscited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Misleading Large Language Models used (or misused) in Scientific Peer-Reviewing via Hidden Prompt-Injection Attacks
  2. 2026LLM-as-a-Reviewer: Benchmarking Their Ability, Divergence, and Prompt Injection Resistance as Paper Reviewers
  3. 2025When Your Reviewer is an LLM: Biases, Divergence, and Prompt Injection Risks in Peer Review
  4. 2025Too Easily Fooled? Prompt Injection Breaks LLMs on Frustratingly Simple Multiple-Choice Questions
  5. 2024Automatic and Universal Prompt Injection Attacks against Large Language Models
  6. 2026SafeReview: Defending LLM-based Review Systems Against Adversarial Hidden Prompts
  7. 2026An Empirical Evaluation of Prompt Injection Vulnerabilities in Large Language Models Across Multilingual and Obfuscated Attack Scenarios
  8. 2025ChatGPT: Excellent Paper! Accept It. Editor: Imposter Found! Review Rejected