mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Toward Trustworthy Agentic AI: A Multimodal Framework for Preventing Prompt Injection Attacks

arXiv 2512.23557 ↗First posted 29 Dec 2025cs.CR cs.AIcited by 8

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Powerful autonomous systems, which reason, plan, and converse using and between numerous tools and agents, are made possible by Large Language Models (LLMs), Vision-Language Models (VLMs), and new agentic AI systems, like LangChain and GraphChain. Nevertheless, this agentic environment increases the probability of the occurrence of multimodal prompt injection (PI) attacks, in which concealed or malicious instructions carried in text, pictures, metadata, or agent-to-agent messages may spread throughout the graph and lead to unintended behavior, a breach of policy, or corruption of state. In order to mitigate these risks, this paper suggests a Cross-Agent Multimodal Provenanc- Aware Defense Framework whereby all the prompts, either user-generated or produced by upstream agents, are sanitized and all the outputs generated by an LLM are verified independently before being sent to downstream nodes. This framework contains a Text sanitizer agent, visual sanitizer agent, and output validator agent all coordinated by a provenance ledger, which keeps metadata of modality, source, and trust level throughout the entire agent network. This architecture makes sure that agent-to-agent communication abides by clear trust frames such such that injected instructions are not propagated down LangChain or GraphChain-style-workflows. The experimental assessments show that multimodal injection detection accuracy is significantly enhanced, and the cross-agent trust leakage is minimized, as well as, agentic execution pathways become stable. The framework, which expands the concept of provenance tracking and validation to the multi-agent orchestration, enhances the establishment of secure, understandable and reliable agentic AI systems.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 5 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Dec 2025.

Builds on

5 of 15 references.

References · 5

  1. 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Modelscited by 3,104
  2. 2025Agentic AI Framework for Individuals with Disabilities and Neurodivergence: A Multi-Agent System for Healthy Eating, Daily Routines, and Inclusive Well-Beingcited by 8
  3. 2025Agentic AI Framework for Cloudburst Prediction and Coordinated Responsecited by 6
  4. 2025FinAgent: An Agentic AI Framework Integrating Personal Finance and Nutrition Planningcited by 6
  5. 2025Agentic AI Framework for Smart Inventory Replenishmentcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 8.

8 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026An Experimental Evaluation of Multimodal Prompt Injection Attacks on Agentic AI Frameworks
  2. 2026Trustworthy Agentic AI: A Comprehensive Cybersecurity and Systems Survey on Threat Landscapes, Defense Architectures, and Open Challenges
  3. 2026From Secure Agentic AI to Secure Agentic Web: Challenges, Threats, and Future Directions
  4. 2026SoK: The Attack Surface of Agentic AI - Tools and Autonomy
  5. 2025MLA-Trust: Benchmarking Trustworthiness of Multimodal LLM Agents in GUI Environments
  6. 2026Trustworthy Agentic AI: Failure Modes, Mitigation Strategies, and a Lifecycle Framework for Autonomous LLM Systems
  7. 2026Towards trustworthy agentic AI: a comprehensive survey of safety, robustness, privacy, and system security
  8. 2025Prompt Injection Detection and Mitigation via AI Multi-Agent NLP Frameworks