mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

SE-MLP Model for Predicting Prior Acceleration Features in Penetration Signals

arXiv 2512.23131 ↗First posted 29 Dec 2025cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Accurate identification of the penetration process relies heavily on prior feature values of penetration acceleration. However, these feature values are typically obtained through long simulation cycles and expensive computations. To overcome this limitation, this paper proposes a multi-layer Perceptron architecture, termed squeeze and excitation multi-layer perceptron (SE-MLP), which integrates a channel attention mechanism with residual connections to enable rapid prediction of acceleration feature values. Using physical parameters under different working conditions as inputs, the model outputs layer-wise acceleration features, thereby establishing a nonlinear mapping between physical parameters and penetration characteristics. Comparative experiments against conventional MLP, XGBoost, and Transformer models demonstrate that SE-MLP achieves superior prediction accuracy, generalization, and stability. Ablation studies further confirm that both the channel attention module and residual structure contribute significantly to performance gains. Numerical simulations and range recovery tests show that the discrepancies between predicted and measured acceleration peaks and pulse widths remain within acceptable engineering tolerances. These results validate the feasibility and engineering applicability of the proposed method and provide a practical basis for rapidly generating prior feature values for penetration fuzes.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Dec 2025.

Builds on

4 of 23 references.

References · 4

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2017Squeeze-and-Excitation Networkscited by 4,789
  3. 2024IMAGDressing-v1: Customizable Virtual Dressingcited by 100
  4. 2022The choice of scaling technique matters for classification performancecited by 25

Built on by

Not cited yet.