mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

APO: Alpha-Divergence Preference Optimization

arXiv 2512.22953 ↗First posted 28 Dec 2025cs.LG cs.AIcited by 2

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Reward modeling and RLHF

Abstract (arXiv)

Two divergence regimes dominate modern alignment practice. Supervised fine-tuning and many distillation-style objectives implicitly minimize the forward KL divergence KL(q || pi_theta), yielding stable mode-covering updates but often under-exploiting high-reward modes. In contrast, PPO-style online reinforcement learning from human feedback behaves closer to reverse KL divergence KL(pi_theta || q), enabling mode-seeking improvements but risking mode collapse. Recent anchored methods, such as ADPO, show that performing the projection in anchored coordinates can substantially improve stability, yet they typically commit to a single divergence. We introduce Alpha-Divergence Preference Optimization (APO), an anchored framework that uses Csiszar alpha-divergence to continuously interpolate between forward and reverse KL behavior within the same anchored geometry. We derive unified gradient dynamics parameterized by alpha, analyze gradient variance properties, and propose a practical reward-and-confidence-guarded alpha schedule that transitions from coverage to exploitation only when the policy is both improving and confidently calibrated. Experiments on Qwen3-1.7B with math-level3 demonstrate that APO achieves competitive performance with GRPO and GSPO baselines while maintaining training stability.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reward modeling and RLHF, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 14 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Dec 2025.

Builds on

14 of 28 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model29 May
  2. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferences12 Jun

Other references · 12

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  2. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
  3. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
  4. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
  5. 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,580
  6. 2024SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free Rewardcited by 963
  7. 2023A General Theoretical Paradigm to Understand Learning from Human Preferencescited by 912
  8. 2016f-GAN: Training Generative Neural Samplers using Variational Divergence Minimizationcited by 506
  9. 2019A Divergence Minimization Perspective on Imitation Learning Methodscited by 190
  10. 2016R'enyi Divergence Variational Inferencecited by 104
  11. 2025GTPO: Stabilizing Group Relative Policy Optimization via Gradient and Entropy Controlcited by 18
  12. 2025G2RPO-A: Guided Group Relative Policy Optimization with Adaptive Guidancecited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Unifying Stable Optimization and Reference Regularization in RLHF
  2. 2026FlowCPO: A Unified Divergence View of Preference Alignment for Flow Models
  3. 2023Beyond Reverse KL: Generalizing Direct Preference Optimization with Diverse Divergence Constraints
  4. 2024Back to Basics: Revisiting REINFORCE Style Optimization for Learning from Human Feedback in LLMs
  5. 2026f-GRPO and Beyond: Divergence-Based Reinforcement Learning Algorithms for General LLM Alignment
  6. 2024Accelerated Preference Optimization for Large Language Model Alignment
  7. 2024Aligning Diffusion Behaviors with Q-functions for Efficient Continuous Control
  8. 2025KL-Regularized Reinforcement Learning is Designed to Mode Collapse