APO: Alpha-Divergence Preference Optimization
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Reward modeling and RLHF
Abstract (arXiv)
Two divergence regimes dominate modern alignment practice. Supervised fine-tuning and many distillation-style objectives implicitly minimize the forward KL divergence KL(q || pi_theta), yielding stable mode-covering updates but often under-exploiting high-reward modes. In contrast, PPO-style online reinforcement learning from human feedback behaves closer to reverse KL divergence KL(pi_theta || q), enabling mode-seeking improvements but risking mode collapse. Recent anchored methods, such as ADPO, show that performing the projection in anchored coordinates can substantially improve stability, yet they typically commit to a single divergence. We introduce Alpha-Divergence Preference Optimization (APO), an anchored framework that uses Csiszar alpha-divergence to continuously interpolate between forward and reverse KL behavior within the same anchored geometry. We derive unified gradient dynamics parameterized by alpha, analyze gradient variance properties, and propose a practical reward-and-confidence-guarded alpha schedule that transitions from coverage to exploitation only when the policy is both improving and confidently calibrated. Experiments on Qwen3-1.7B with math-level3 demonstrate that APO achieves competitive performance with GRPO and GSPO baselines while maintaining training stability.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reward modeling and RLHF, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 14 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Dec 2025.
Builds on
14 of 28 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model29 May
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferences12 Jun
Other references · 12
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
- 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,580
- 2024SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free Rewardcited by 963
- 2023A General Theoretical Paradigm to Understand Learning from Human Preferencescited by 912
- 2016f-GAN: Training Generative Neural Samplers using Variational Divergence Minimizationcited by 506
- 2019A Divergence Minimization Perspective on Imitation Learning Methodscited by 190
- 2016R'enyi Divergence Variational Inferencecited by 104
- 2025GTPO: Stabilizing Group Relative Policy Optimization via Gradient and Entropy Controlcited by 18
- 2025G2RPO-A: Guided Group Relative Policy Optimization with Adaptive Guidancecited by 10
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Unifying Stable Optimization and Reference Regularization in RLHF
- 2026FlowCPO: A Unified Divergence View of Preference Alignment for Flow Models
- 2023Beyond Reverse KL: Generalizing Direct Preference Optimization with Diverse Divergence Constraints
- 2024Back to Basics: Revisiting REINFORCE Style Optimization for Learning from Human Feedback in LLMs
- 2026f-GRPO and Beyond: Divergence-Based Reinforcement Learning Algorithms for General LLM Alignment
- 2024Accelerated Preference Optimization for Large Language Model Alignment
- 2024Aligning Diffusion Behaviors with Q-functions for Efficient Continuous Control
- 2025KL-Regularized Reinforcement Learning is Designed to Mode Collapse