mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Adapting, Fast and Slow: On Few-Shot Transportability of Compositions

arXiv 2512.22777 ↗First posted 28 Dec 2025cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Generalization across domains requires stable structure that links the source and target distributions. Building on causal transportability theory, we study a sequential prediction setting in which the target predictor can be represented as a circuit composed of causal mechanisms that are learnable from source data. We introduce two classes of transportability. Module transportability captures the atomic case, where the target predictor is given by a mechanism learnable from a single source domain. Circuit transportability generalizes this idea to target predictors obtained by composing several modules learned from source data, enabling zero-shot prediction even when no source mechanism directly predicts the target label. We study these classes of circuits under increasingly relaxed assumptions. First, we provide conditions under which the relevant circuits can be learned from source data alone, given causal knowledge about the source and target domains. We then relax these structural assumptions by allowing limited data from the target domain. In particular, we develop a supervised domain adaptation scheme that learns circuits without requiring explicit causal structure. The resulting few-shot guarantees tie the achievable error to the size of the smallest target circuit composable from modules learned from source data. Finally, we propose a gradient-based relaxation of the symbolic circuit search and evaluate it empirically, showing that it qualitatively tracks the predicted regimes of fast adaptation -- with and without process supervision over intermediate positions -- and slow adaptation when no source mechanism matches.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Dec 2025.

Builds on

21 of 63 references.

References · 21

  1. 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,515
  2. 2015Causal inference using invariant prediction: identification and confidence intervalscited by 536
  3. 2015Neural Module Networkscited by 376
  4. 2019Compositionality decomposed: how do neural networks generalise?cited by 265
  5. 2020COGS: A Compositional Generalization Challenge Based on Semantic Interpretationcited by 263
  6. 2022Exploring Length Generalization in Large Language Modelscited by 206
  7. 2023What Algorithms can Transformers Learn? A Study in Length Generalizationcited by 199
  8. 2018Domain Generalization via Conditional Invariant Representationcited by 146
  9. 2017Domain Adaptation by Using Causal Inference to Predict Invariant Conditional Distributionscited by 126
  10. 2018Anchor regression: heterogeneous data meets causalitycited by 118
  11. 2024How Transformers Learn Causal Structure with Gradient Descentcited by 118
  12. 2020A Benchmark for Systematic Generalization in Grounded Language Understandingcited by 108
9 more
  1. 2022The CLRS Algorithmic Reasoning Benchmarkcited by 106
  2. 2017Learning Independent Causal Mechanismscited by 105
  3. 2019Compositional generalization through meta sequence-to-sequence learningcited by 99
  4. 2020On the Value of Target Data in Transfer Learningcited by 65
  5. 2021Meta-Learning to Compositionally Generalizecited by 62
  6. 2020When is invariance useful in an Out-of-Distribution Generalization problem ?cited by 52
  7. 2013On the Generalization Ability of Online Learning Algorithms for Pairwise Loss Functionscited by 23
  8. 2021How to transfer algorithmic reasoning knowledge to learn new algorithms?cited by 22
  9. 2025Partial Transportability for Domain Generalizationcited by 8

Built on by

Not cited yet.