Optimal Regulation of Nonlinear Input-Affine Systems via an Integral Reinforcement Learning-Based State-Dependent Riccati Equation Approach
On the map: Deep reinforcement learning methods → RL theory and sample complexity
Abstract (arXiv)
The State-Dependent Riccati Equation (SDRE) technique generalizes the classical algebraic Riccati formulation to nonlinear systems by designing an input to the system that optimally(suboptimally) regulates system states toward the origin while simultaneously optimizing a quadratic performance index. In the SDRE technique, we solve the State-Dependent Riccati Equation to determine the control for regulating a nonlinear input-affine system. Since an analytic solution to SDRE is not straightforward, one method is to linearize the system at every state, solve the corresponding Algebraic Riccati Equation (ARE), and apply optimal control until the next state of the system. Completing this task with high frequency gives a result like the original SDRE technique. Both approaches require a complete model; therefore, here we propose a method that solves ARE in every state of the system using a partially model-free approach that learns optimal control in every state of the system, without explicit knowledge of the drift dynamics, based on Integral Reinforcement Learning (IRL). To show the effectiveness of our proposed approach, we apply it to the second-order nonlinear system in simulation and compare its performance with the classical SDRE method, which relies on the system's model and solves the ARE at each state. Our simulation results demonstrate that, with sufficient iterations, the IRL-based approach achieves approximately the same performance as the conventional SDRE method, demonstrating its capability as a reliable alternative for nonlinear system control that does not require an explicit environmental model. Index Terms-Algebraic Riccati Equation (ARE), Integral Reinforcement Learning (IRL), Nonlinear Input-Affine Systems, Optimal Regulation, State-Dependent Riccati Equation (SDRE)
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in RL theory and sample complexity, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods. Builds on 1 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Dec 2025.
Builds on
1 of 20 references.
References · 1
- 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,515
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Data-Driven Inverse Optimal Control for Continuous-Time Nonlinear Systems
- 2024Stochastic Reinforcement Learning with Stability Guarantees for Control of Unknown Nonlinear Systems
- 2026Reinforcement Learning Method for Zero-Sum Linear-Quadratic Stochastic Differential Games in Infinite Horizons
- 2026LC-SAC: Lyapunov-Constrained Soft Actor-Critic via Koopman Operator Theory for Trajectory Tracking and Stabilization
- 2025Bridging Continuous-time LQR and Reinforcement Learning via Gradient Flow of the Bellman Error
- 2025Linear Dynamics meets Linear MDPs: Closed-Form Optimal Policies via Reinforcement Learning
- 2025Neural Co-state Projection Regulator: A Model-free Paradigm for Real-time Optimal Control with Input Constraints
- 2024Model-free H∞ control of Ito stochastic system via off-policy reinforcement learning