The Quest for Winning Tickets in Low-Rank Adapters
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis (LTH) suggests that over-parameterized neural networks contain sparse subnetworks ("winning tickets") capable of matching full model performance when trained from scratch. With the growing reliance on fine-tuning large pretrained models, we investigate whether LTH extends to parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT), specifically focusing on Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) methods. Our key finding is that LTH holds within LoRAs, revealing sparse subnetworks that can match the performance of dense adapters. In particular, we find that the effectiveness of sparse subnetworks depends more on how much sparsity is applied in each layer than on the exact weights included in the subnetwork. Building on this insight, we propose Partial-LoRA, a method that systematically identifies said subnetworks and trains sparse low-rank adapters aligned with task-relevant subspaces of the pre-trained model. Experiments across 8 vision and 12 language tasks in both single-task and multi-task settings show that Partial-LoRA reduces the number of trainable parameters by up to 87%, while maintaining or improving accuracy. Our results not only deepen our theoretical understanding of transfer learning and the interplay between pretraining and fine-tuning but also open new avenues for developing more efficient adaptation strategies.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Dec 2025.
Builds on
26 of 34 references.
References · 26
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
- 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,899
- 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,262
- 2019BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questionscited by 2,183
- 2019SuperGLUE: A Stickier Benchmark for General-Purpose Language Understanding Systemscited by 1,729
- 2013Fine-Grained Visual Classification of Aircraftcited by 1,726
- 2021DeBERTaV3: Improving DeBERTa using ELECTRA-Style Pre-Training with Gradient-Disentangled Embedding Sharingcited by 1,254
- 2018SNIP: Single-shot Network Pruning based on Connection Sensitivitycited by 812
- 2020Intrinsic Dimensionality Explains the Effectiveness of Language Model Fine-Tuningcited by 671
- 2019Importance Estimation for Neural Network Pruningcited by 541
- 2024LoRA+: Efficient Low Rank Adaptation of Large Modelscited by 377
14 more
- 2018Measuring the Intrinsic Dimension of Objective Landscapescited by 370
- 2023Side Adapter Network for Open-Vocabulary Semantic Segmentationcited by 300
- 2023VeRA: Vector-based Random Matrix Adaptationcited by 300
- 2022The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Random Pruning: Return of the Most Naive Baseline for Sparse Trainingcited by 85
- 2023IncreLoRA: Incremental Parameter Allocation Method for Parameter-Efficient Fine-tuningcited by 45
- 2023LoRAShear: Efficient Large Language Model Structured Pruning and Knowledge Recoverycited by 38
- 2021On the Existence of Universal Lottery Ticketscited by 30
- 2022Why Random Pruning Is All We Need to Start Sparsecited by 26
- 2024Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning for Pre-Trained Vision Models: A Survey and Benchmarkcited by 23
- 2022Most Activation Functions Can Win the Lottery Without Excessive Depthcited by 21
- 2021Pruning Randomly Initialized Neural Networks with Iterative Randomizationcited by 20
- 2024Random Masking Finds Winning Tickets for Parameter Efficient Fine-tuningcited by 17
- 2023The Expressive Power of Tuning Only the Normalization Layerscited by 13
- 2024PRILoRA: Pruned and Rank-Increasing Low-Rank Adaptationcited by 8
Built on by
Not cited yet.