PDx -- Adaptive Credit Risk Forecasting Model in Digital Lending using Machine Learning Operations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper presents PDx, an adaptive, machine learning operations (MLOps) driven decision system for forecasting credit risk using probability of default (PD) modeling in digital lending. While conventional PD models prioritize predictive accuracy during model development with complex machine learning algorithms, they often overlook continuous adaptation to changing borrower behaviour, resulting in static models that degrade over time in production and generate inaccurate default predictions. Many financial institutes also find it difficult transitioning ML models from development environment to production and maintaining their health. With PDx we aimed to addresses these limitations using a dynamic, end-to-end model lifecycle management approach that integrates continuous model monitoring, retraining, and validation through a robust MLOps pipeline. We introduced a dynamic champion-challenger framework for PDx to regularly update baseline models to recalibrate independent parameters with the latest data and select the best-performing model through out-of-time validation, ensuring resilience against data drift and changing credit risk patterns. Our empirical analysis shows that decision tree-based ensemble models consistently outperform others in classifying defaulters but require frequent updates to sustain performance. Linear models (e.g., logistic regression) and neural networks exhibit greater performance degradation. The study demonstrate with PDx we can mitigates value erosion for digital lenders, particularly in short-term, small-ticket loans, where borrower behavior shifts rapidly. We have validated the effectiveness of PDx using datasets from peer-to-peer lending, business loans, and auto loans, demonstrating its scalability and adaptability for modern credit risk forecasting.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 88 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Dec 2025.
Builds on
10 of 88 references.
References · 10
- 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
- 2021Bayesian Optimization is Superior to Random Search for Machine Learning Hyperparameter Tuning: Analysis of the Black-Box Optimization Challenge 2020cited by 146
- 2022Machine Learning Operations (MLOps): Overview, Definition, and Architecturecited by 126
- 2021Fairness in Credit Scoring: Assessment, Implementation and Profit Implicationscited by 65
- 2020The Value of Big Data for Credit Scoring: Enhancing Financial Inclusion using Mobile Phone Data and Social Network Analyticscited by 21
- 2020The value of text for small business default prediction: A deep learning approachcited by 20
- 2022Algorithmic decision making methods for fair credit scoringcited by 5
- 2019Gradient Boosting Survival Tree with Applications in Credit Scoringcited by 4
- 2023MLOps for Scarce Image Data: A Use Case in Microscopic Image Analysiscited by 4
- 2021Enabling Machine Learning Algorithms for Credit Scoring -- Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) methods for clear understanding complex predictive modelscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.