Field strength-dependent performance variability in deep learning-based analysis of magnetic resonance imaging
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This study quantitatively evaluates the impact of MRI scanner magnetic field strength on the performance and generalizability of deep learning-based segmentation algorithms. Three publicly available MRI datasets (breast tumor, pancreas, and cervical spine) were stratified by scanner field strength (1.5T vs. 3.0T). For each segmentation task, three nnU-Net-based models were developed: A model trained on 1.5T data only (m-1.5T), a model trained on 3.0T data only (m-3.0T), and a model trained on pooled 1.5T and 3.0T data (m-combined). Each model was evaluated on both 1.5T and 3.0T validation sets. Field-strength-dependent performance differences were investigated via Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP)-based clustering and radiomic analysis, including 23 first-order and texture features. For breast tumor segmentation, m-3.0T (DSC: 0.494 [1.5T] and 0.433 [3.0T]) significantly outperformed m-1.5T (DSC: 0.411 [1.5T] and 0.289 [3.0T]) and m-combined (DSC: 0.373 [1.5T] and 0.268[3.0T]) on both validation sets (p<0.0001). Pancreas segmentation showed similar trends: m-3.0T achieved the highest DSC (0.774 [1.5T], 0.840 [3.0T]), while m-1.5T underperformed significantly (p<0.0001). For cervical spine, models performed optimally on same-field validation sets with minimal cross-field performance degradation (DSC>0.92 for all comparisons). Radiomic analysis revealed moderate field-strength-dependent clustering in soft tissues (silhouette scores 0.23-0.29) but minimal separation in osseous structures (0.12). These results indicate that magnetic field strength in the training data substantially influences the performance of deep learning-based segmentation models, particularly for soft-tissue structures (e.g., small lesions). This warrants consideration of magnetic field strength as a confounding factor in studies evaluating AI performance on MRI.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Dec 2025.
Builds on
4 of 20 references.
References · 4
- 2021Domain Adaptation for Medical Image Analysis: A Surveycited by 351
- 2024A large-scale multicenter breast cancer DCE-MRI benchmark dataset with expert segmentationscited by 40
- 2019The Domain Shift Problem of Medical Image Segmentation and Vendor-Adaptation by Unet-GANcited by 30
- 2024The Impact of Scanner Domain Shift on Deep Learning Performance in Medical Imaging: an Experimental Studycited by 15
Built on by
Not cited yet.