mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

From Theory to Throughput: CUDA-Optimized APML for Large-Batch 3D Learning

arXiv 2512.19743 ↗First posted 17 Dec 2025cs.LG cs.AI cs.CGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Loss functions are fundamental to learning accurate 3D point cloud models, yet common choices trade geometric fidelity for computational cost. Chamfer Distance is efficient but permits many-to-one correspondences, while Earth Mover Distance better reflects one-to-one transport at high computational cost. APML approximates transport with differentiable Sinkhorn iterations and an analytically derived temperature, but its dense formulation scales quadratically in memory. We present CUDA-APML, a sparse GPU implementation that thresholds negligible assignments and runs adaptive softmax, bidirectional symmetrization, and Sinkhorn normalization directly in COO form. This yields near-linear memory scaling and preserves gradients on the stored support, while pairwise distance evaluation remains quadratic in the current implementation. On ShapeNet and MM-Fi, CUDA-APML matches dense APML within a small tolerance while reducing peak GPU memory by 99.9%. Code available at: https://github.com/Multimodal-Sensing-Lab/apml

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Dec 2025.

Builds on

27 of 34 references.

References · 27

  1. 2016PointNet: Deep Learning on Point Sets for 3D Classification and Segmentationcited by 5,248
  2. 2019nuScenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous drivingcited by 4,523
  3. 2022FlashAttention: Fast and Memory-Efficient Exact Attention with IO-Awarenesscited by 3,673
  4. 2017ScanNet: Richly-annotated 3D Reconstructions of Indoor Scenescited by 3,117
  5. 2015ShapeNet: An Information-Rich 3D Model Repositorycited by 2,897
  6. 2013Sinkhorn Distances: Lightspeed Computation of Optimal Transportation Distancescited by 2,316
  7. 2019SuperGlue: Learning Feature Matching with Graph Neural Networkscited by 1,443
  8. 20194D Spatio-Temporal ConvNets: Minkowski Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 1,208
  9. 2016A Point Set Generation Network for 3D Object Reconstruction from a Single Imagecited by 979
  10. 2018PointConv: Deep Convolutional Networks on 3D Point Cloudscited by 657
  11. 2019Deep Learning for 3D Point Clouds: A Surveycited by 558
  12. 2017Large-scale Point Cloud Semantic Segmentation with Superpoint Graphscited by 385
15 more
  1. 2018PCN: Point Completion Networkcited by 384
  2. 2017Learning Generative Models with Sinkhorn Divergencescited by 314
  3. 2021PoinTr: Diverse Point Cloud Completion with Geometry-Aware Transformerscited by 286
  4. 2017Semantic3D.net: A new Large-scale Point Cloud Classification Benchmarkcited by 158
  5. 2021Density-aware Chamfer Distance as a Comprehensive Metric for Point Cloud Completioncited by 112
  6. 2020Kernel Operations on the GPU, with Autodiff, without Memory Overflowscited by 104
  7. 2017Smooth and Sparse Optimal Transportcited by 83
  8. 2023MM-Fi: Multi-Modal Non-Intrusive 4D Human Dataset for Versatile Wireless Sensingcited by 79
  9. 2022TorchSparse: Efficient Point Cloud Inference Enginecited by 73
  10. 2021Accurate Point Cloud Registration with Robust Optimal Transportcited by 38
  11. 2024Accelerating Sinkhorn Algorithm with Sparse Newton Iterationscited by 11
  12. 2023Importance Sparsification for Sinkhorn Algorithmcited by 6
  13. 2025TUM2TWIN: Introducing the Large-Scale Multimodal Urban Digital Twin Benchmark Datasetcited by 5
  14. 2025APML: Adaptive Probabilistic Matching Loss for Robust 3D Point Cloud Reconstructioncited by 3
  15. 2024Spatio-Temporal 3D Point Clouds from WiFi-CSI Data via Transformer Networkscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.