When Less is More: 8-bit Quantization Improves Continual Learning in Large Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Catastrophic forgetting poses a fundamental challenge in continual learning, particularly when models are quantized for deployment efficiency. We systematically investigate the interplay between quantization precision (FP16, INT8, INT4) and replay buffer strategies in large language models, revealing unexpected dynamics. While FP16 achieves superior initial task performance (74.44% on NLU), we observe a striking inversion on subsequent tasks: quantized models outperform FP16 by 8-15% on final task forward accuracy, with INT4 achieving nearly double FP16's performance on Code generation (40% vs 20%). Critically, even minimal replay buffers (0.1%) dramatically improve retention - increasing NLU retention after Math training from 45% to 65% across all precision levels - with INT8 consistently achieving the optimal balance between learning plasticity and knowledge retention. We hypothesize that quantization-induced noise acts as implicit regularization, preventing the overfitting to new task gradients that plagues high-precision models. These findings challenge the conventional wisdom that higher precision is always preferable, suggesting instead that INT8 quantization offers both computational efficiency and superior continual learning dynamics. Our results provide practical guidelines for deploying compressed models in continual learning scenarios: small replay buffers (1-2%) suffice for NLU tasks, while Math and Code benefit from moderate buffers (5-10%), with quantized models requiring less replay than FP16 to achieve comparable retention. Code is available at https://github.com/Festyve/LessIsMore.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 22 Dec 2025.
Builds on
0 of 0 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Exploring the Trade-Offs: Quantization Methods, Task Difficulty, and Model Size in Large Language Models From Edge to Giant
- 2026Compress and Forget: bitsandbytes Quantization Amplifies Proactive Interference in LLMs
- 2026The Structure of Quantization Damage in LLMs: Why the Next Bit Should Be Spent Globally
- 2026STEPQuant: When and Where Errors Matter in Delta-Rule Recurrent State Quantization
- 2026Quantization Degradation in Large Language Models: A Signal-Noise Perspective
- 2024Examining Forgetting in Continual Pre-training of Aligned Large Language Models
- 2026Forgetting in Language Models: Capacity, Optimization, and Self-Generated Replay
- 2026DAMP: Decay-Aware Mixed-Precision Recurrent-State Quantization