ML Inference Scheduling with Predictable Latency
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Machine learning (ML) inference serving systems can schedule requests to improve GPU utilization and to meet service level objectives (SLOs) or deadlines. However, improving GPU utilization may compromise latency-sensitive scheduling, as concurrent tasks contend for GPU resources and thereby introduce interference. Given that interference effects introduce unpredictability in scheduling, neglecting them may compromise SLO or deadline satisfaction. Nevertheless, existing interference prediction approaches remain limited in several respects, which may restrict their usefulness for scheduling. First, they are often coarse-grained, which ignores runtime co-location dynamics and thus restricts their accuracy in interference prediction. Second, they tend to use a static prediction model, which may not effectively cope with different workload characteristics. In this paper, we evaluate the potential limitations of existing interference prediction approaches, finding that coarse-grained methods can lead to noticeable deviations in prediction accuracy and that static models degrade considerably under changing workloads.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Dec 2025.
Builds on
5 of 24 references.
References · 5
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
- 2016Clipper: A Low-Latency Online Prediction Serving Systemcited by 191
- 2017TensorFlow-Serving: Flexible, High-Performance ML Servingcited by 85
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.