mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Why Most Optimism Bandit Algorithms Have the Same Regret Analysis: A Simple Unifying Theorem

arXiv 2512.18409 ↗First posted 20 Dec 2025cs.LG cs.SY eess.SYcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Several optimism-based stochastic bandit algorithms -- including UCB, UCB-V, linear UCB, and finite-arm GP-UCB -- achieve logarithmic regret using proofs that, despite superficial differences, follow essentially the same structure. This note isolates the minimal ingredients behind these analyses: a single high-probability concentration condition on the estimators, after which logarithmic regret follows from two short deterministic lemmas describing radius collapse and optimism-forced deviations. The framework yields unified, near-minimal proofs for these classical algorithms and extends naturally to many contemporary bandit variants.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 11 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Dec 2025.

Builds on

5 of 11 references.

References · 5

  1. 2018Information Directed Sampling and Bandits with Heteroscedastic Noisecited by 75
  2. 2025Multi-Armed Bandits With Machine Learning-Generated Surrogate Rewardscited by 13
  3. 2022Breaking the √T Barrier: Instance-Independent Logarithmic Regret in Stochastic Contextual Linear Banditscited by 5
  4. 2024Data-Driven Upper Confidence Bounds with Near-Optimal Regret for Heavy-Tailed Banditscited by 2
  5. 2025No-Regret Linear Bandits under Gap-Adjusted Misspecificationcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.