Shuttling Compiler for Trapped-Ion Quantum Computers Based on Fine-Tuned Large Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In trapped-ion quantum computers, qubits must be shuttled between segments to interact. The routing logic that schedules these movements is written by hand for every new trap architecture. We present shuttling compilers based on five large language models (LLMs). Each LLM is fine-tuned on shuttling schedules produced by hand-coded heuristics for linear and branched one-dimensional trap architectures. We investigate how the shuttling operation counts of their schedules compare with those of the heuristics and how far they generalize to unseen architectures. For circuits of up to 16 qubits, the fine-tuned LLMs generate valid schedules on both training architectures, more often the fewer qubits a circuit has. In 12% of the compilations yielding a schedule, the best of ten runs needs up to 21% fewer operations than the heuristic baselines, after a rule-based post-processing step. A single run of one fine-tuned LLM produces a valid shuttling schedule for a previously unseen four-way branched architecture. This is preliminary evidence of cross-architecture generalization. On two other unseen architectures no LLM produces a valid schedule. Thus, LLM-learned shuttling compilation is feasible, and we show how far it currently reaches.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 86 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Dec 2025.
Builds on
27 of 86 references.
References · 27
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
- 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,146
- 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,767
- 2023QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMscited by 3,355
- 2023FlashAttention-2: Faster Attention with Better Parallelism and Work Partitioningcited by 2,551
- 2023A Survey of Large Language Modelscited by 2,537
- 2025Gemma 3 Technical Reportcited by 1,686
- 2019ZeRO: Memory Optimizations Toward Training Trillion Parameter Modelscited by 1,278
15 more
- 2025gpt-oss-120b & gpt-oss-20b Model Cardcited by 1,258
- 2016Training Deep Nets with Sublinear Memory Costcited by 825
- 2023PyTorch FSDP: Experiences on Scaling Fully Sharded Data Parallelcited by 641
- 2023Ring Attention with Blockwise Transformers for Near-Infinite Contextcited by 448
- 2021ZeRO-Offload: Democratizing Billion-Scale Model Trainingcited by 339
- 2022Reducing Activation Recomputation in Large Transformer Modelscited by 300
- 2025Is Your LLM Overcharging You? Tokenization, Transparency, and Incentivescited by 13
- 2024Enhancing Training Efficiency Using Packing with Flash Attentioncited by 12
- 2019On the qubit routing problemcited by 11
- 2021Qubit Routing using Graph Neural Network aided Monte Carlo Tree Searchcited by 9
- 2024AlphaRouter: Quantum Circuit Routing with Reinforcement Learning and Tree Searchcited by 8
- 2022Quantum Circuit Compiler for a Shuttling-Based Trapped-Ion Quantum Computercited by 2
- 2024Compiler for Distributed Quantum Computing: a Reinforcement Learning Approachcited by 2
- 2025MUSS-TI: Multi-level Shuttle Scheduling for Large-Scale Entanglement Module Linked Trapped-Ioncited by 2
- 2024Attention-Based Deep Reinforcement Learning for Qubit Allocation in Modular Quantum Architecturescited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.