mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Comparison of deep learning models: CNN and VGG-16 in identifying pornographic content

arXiv 2512.16947 ↗First posted 17 Dec 2025cs.CVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In 2020, a total of 59,741 websites were blocked by the Indonesian government due to containing negative content, including pornography, with 14,266 websites falling into this category. However, these blocked websites could still be accessed by the public using virtual private networks (VPNs). This prompted the research idea to quickly identify pornographic content. This study aims to develop a system capable of identifying websites suspected of containing pornographic image content, using a deep learning approach with convolutional neural network (CNN) and visual geometry group 16 (VGG-16) model. The two models were then explored comprehensively and holistically to determine which model was most effective in detecting pornographic content quickly. Based on the findings of the comparison between testing the CNN and VGG-16 models, research results showed that the best test results were obtained in the eighth experiment using the CNN model at an epoch value level of 50 and a learning rate of 0.001 of 0.9487 or 94.87%. This can be interpreted that the CNN model is more effective in detecting pornographic content quickly and accurately compared to using the VGG-16 model.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 1 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Dec 2025.

Builds on

1 of 32 references.

References · 1

  1. 2022Artificial Neural Networks for Finger Vein Recognition: A Surveycited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.