Few-Shot Inference of Human Perceptions of Robot Performance in Social Navigation Scenarios
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Understanding how humans evaluate robot behavior during human-robot interactions is crucial for developing socially aware robots that behave according to human expectations. While the traditional approach to capturing these evaluations is to conduct a user study, recent work has proposed utilizing machine learning instead. However, existing data-driven methods require large amounts of labeled data, which limits their use in practice. To address this gap, we propose leveraging the few-shot learning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) to improve how well a robot can predict a user's perception of its performance, and study this idea experimentally in social navigation tasks. To this end, we extend the SEAN TOGETHER dataset with additional real-world human-robot navigation episodes and participant feedback. Using this augmented dataset, we evaluate the ability of several LLMs to predict human perceptions of robot performance from a small number of in-context examples, based on observed spatio-temporal cues of the robot and surrounding human motion. Our results demonstrate that LLMs can match or exceed the performance of traditional supervised learning models while requiring an order of magnitude fewer labeled instances. We further show that prediction performance can improve with more in-context examples, confirming the scalability of our approach. Additionally, we investigate what kind of sensor-based information an LLM relies on to make these inferences by conducting an ablation study on the input features considered for performance prediction. Finally, we explore the novel application of personalized examples for in-context learning, i.e., drawn from the same user being evaluated, finding that they further enhance prediction accuracy. This work paves the path to improving robot behavior in a scalable manner through user-centered feedback.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Dec 2025.
Builds on
21 of 63 references.
References · 21
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2014Empirical Evaluation of Gated Recurrent Neural Networks on Sequence Modelingcited by 2,341
- 2021What Makes Good In-Context Examples for GPT-3?cited by 1,184
- 2022A Survey on In-context Learningcited by 717
- 2024LLMs-as-Judges: A Comprehensive Survey on LLM-based Evaluation Methodscited by 451
- 2023Large Language Models Fail on Trivial Alterations to Theory-of-Mind Taskscited by 288
- 2024Long-context LLMs Struggle with Long In-context Learningcited by 285
- 2023The Unlocking Spell on Base LLMs: Rethinking Alignment via In-Context Learningcited by 251
- 2023Evaluating Large Language Models in Theory of Mind Taskscited by 217
- 2023Large Language Models as General Pattern Machinescited by 196
- 2022Active Example Selection for In-Context Learningcited by 195
- 2017DeepVO: Towards End-to-End Visual Odometry with Deep Recurrent Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 173
9 more
- 2023Large Language Models Are Latent Variable Models: Explaining and Finding Good Demonstrations for In-Context Learningcited by 149
- 2024Can LLM be a Personalized Judge?cited by 99
- 2021Core Challenges of Social Robot Navigation: A Surveycited by 97
- 2023LLMCarbon: Modeling the end-to-end Carbon Footprint of Large Language Modelscited by 71
- 2024Keypoint Action Tokens Enable In-Context Imitation Learning in Roboticscited by 71
- 2024In-Context Learning Enables Robot Action Prediction in LLMscited by 25
- 2024Theory of Mind abilities of Large Language Models in Human-Robot Interaction : An Illusion?cited by 22
- 2022A Protocol for Validating Social Navigation Policiescited by 12
- 2024Personalized Adaptation via In-Context Preference Learningcited by 8
Built on by
Not cited yet.