mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Understanding NTK Variance in Implicit Neural Representations

arXiv 2512.15169 ↗First posted 17 Dec 2025cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Implicit Neural Representations (INRs) often converge slowly and struggle to recover high-frequency details due to spectral bias. While prior work links this behavior to the Neural Tangent Kernel (NTK), how specific architectural choices affect NTK conditioning remains unclear. We show that many INR mechanisms can be understood through their impact on a small set of pairwise similarity factors and scaling terms that jointly determine NTK eigenvalue variance. For standard coordinate MLPs, limited input-feature interactions induce large eigenvalue dispersion and poor conditioning. We derive closed-form variance decompositions for common INR components and show that positional encoding reshapes input similarity, spherical normalization reduces variance via layerwise scaling, and Hadamard modulation introduces additional similarity factors strictly below one, yielding multiplicative variance reduction. This unified view explains how diverse INR architectures mitigate spectral bias by improving NTK conditioning. Experiments across multiple tasks confirm the predicted variance reductions and demonstrate faster, more stable convergence with improved reconstruction quality.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 17 Dec 2025.

Builds on

0 of 0 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Not cited yet.