Implicit Bias and Invariance: How Hopfield Networks Efficiently Learn Graph Orbits
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Many learning problems are organized by group symmetries. While invariance is often imposed through architectures or group averaging, we ask when it can emerge from training on a finite random subset of an orbit. We study this question in classical Hopfield networks, where strict memorization can be expressed as a linear margin problem. Reparameterizing minimization of energy flow (MEF) as an exponential loss connects gradient descent to the corresponding minimum-norm hard-margin memorizer. Our main result shows that, for independent uniform samples from any finite permutation orbit, the exact sample hard-margin support vector machine (HSVM) concentrates exponentially around the invariant full-orbit HSVM. Consequently, an orbit-size-independent polynomial number of samples suffices both for approximate parameter invariance and for simultaneous memorization of every orbit element; directional convergence transfers this conclusion asymptotically to MEF gradient descent. For graph-isomorphism orbits, we characterize the invariant parameters as a three-dimensional subspace and show that every such orbit is memorizable. For cliques of fixed linear density, additional symmetry sharpens the uniform memorization bound to O(v4log(1/δ)), exponentially smaller than the orbit size. Together with experiments across several learning rules, these results give a finite-sample account of how optimization bias can recover symmetry from partial group-structured data.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Dec 2025.
Builds on
17 of 58 references.
References · 17
- 2017The Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent on Separable Datacited by 649
- 2020Hopfield Networks is All You Needcited by 461
- 2016Dense Associative Memory for Pattern Recognitioncited by 230
- 2016A vector-contraction inequality for Rademacher complexitiescited by 141
- 2018Convergence of Gradient Descent on Separable Datacited by 108
- 2018A Kernel Theory of Modern Data Augmentationcited by 106
- 2018Risk and parameter convergence of logistic regressioncited by 81
- 2021Provably Strict Generalisation Benefit for Invariance in Kernel Methodscited by 29
- 2023Harmonics of Learning: Universal Fourier Features Emerge in Invariant Networkscited by 23
- 2024Emergent Equivariance in Deep Ensemblescited by 18
- 2023Optimization Dynamics of Equivariant and Augmented Neural Networkscited by 17
- 2023Storage and Learning phase transitions in the Random-Features Hopfield Modelcited by 11
5 more
- 2024Random Features Hopfield Networks generalize retrieval to previously unseen examplescited by 8
- 2020A new method for parameter estimation in probabilistic models: Minimum probability flowcited by 5
- 2020New Insights on Learning Rules for Hopfield Networks: Memory and Objective Function Minimisationcited by 5
- 2014Robust exponential memory in Hopfield networkscited by 4
- 2024Equivariant Neural Tangent Kernelscited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.