Understanding the Gain from Data Filtering in Multimodal Contrastive Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The success of modern multimodal representation learning relies on internet-scale datasets. Due to the low quality of a large fraction of raw web data, data curation has become a critical step in the training pipeline. Filtering using a trained model (i.e., teacher-based filtering) has emerged as a successful solution, leveraging a pre-trained model to compute quality scores. To explain the empirical success of teacher-based filtering, we characterize the performance of filtered contrastive learning under the standard bimodal data generation model. Denoting η∈(0,1] as the fraction of data with correctly matched modalities among n paired samples, we utilize a linear contrastive learning setup to show a provable benefit of data filtering: (i) the error without filtering is upper and lower bounded by frac1η √n, and (ii) the error with teacher-based filtering is upper bounded by frac1√η n in the large η regime, and by frac1√n in the small η regime.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Dec 2025.
Builds on
28 of 41 references.
References · 28
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,513
- 2022LAION-5B: An open large-scale dataset for training next generation image-text modelscited by 4,152
- 2023DataComp: In search of the next generation of multimodal datasetscited by 644
- 2021Understanding Dimensional Collapse in Contrastive Self-supervised Learningcited by 378
- 2023Data Selection for Language Models via Importance Resamplingcited by 329
- 2023Demystifying CLIP Datacited by 270
- 2023Data Filtering Networkscited by 250
- 2024A Survey on Data Selection for Language Modelscited by 236
- 2024QuRating: Selecting High-Quality Data for Training Language Modelscited by 157
- 2022Data Determines Distributional Robustness in Contrastive Language Image Pre-training (CLIP)cited by 138
- 2021Toward Understanding the Feature Learning Process of Self-supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 119
16 more
- 2022Quality Not Quantity: On the Interaction between Dataset Design and Robustness of CLIPcited by 97
- 2023Improving Multimodal Datasets with Image Captioningcited by 93
- 2024Iterative Data Smoothing: Mitigating Reward Overfitting and Overoptimization in RLHFcited by 57
- 2021The Power of Contrast for Feature Learning: A Theoretical Analysiscited by 53
- 2023T-MARS: Improving Visual Representations by Circumventing Text Feature Learningcited by 43
- 2022Understanding Deep Contrastive Learning via Coordinate-wise Optimizationcited by 35
- 2023Towards a statistical theory of data selection under weak supervisioncited by 27
- 2020Choosing the Sample with Lowest Loss makes SGD Robustcited by 26
- 2023Understanding Transferable Representation Learning and Zero-shot Transfer in CLIPcited by 26
- 2025Optimizing ML Training with Metagradient Descentcited by 23
- 2024CLIPLoss and Norm-Based Data Selection Methods for Multimodal Contrastive Learningcited by 20
- 2024Data-Efficient Contrastive Language-Image Pretraining: Prioritizing Data Quality over Quantitycited by 19
- 2024HYPE: Hyperbolic Entailment Filtering for Underspecified Images and Textscited by 17
- 2024Understanding the Gains from Repeated Self-Distillationcited by 15
- 2025A Statistical Theory of Contrastive Pre-training and Multimodal Generative AIcited by 13
- 2025Filter Like You Test: Data-Driven Data Filtering for CLIP Pretrainingcited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.