mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Cisco Integrated AI Security and Safety Framework Report

arXiv 2512.12921 ↗First posted 15 Dec 2025cs.CR cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Artificial intelligence (AI) systems are being readily and rapidly adopted, increasingly permeating critical domains: from consumer platforms and enterprise software to networked systems with embedded agents. While this has unlocked potential for human productivity gains, the attack surface has expanded accordingly: threats now span content safety failures (e.g., harmful or deceptive outputs), model and data integrity compromise (e.g., poisoning, supply-chain tampering), runtime manipulations (e.g., prompt injection, tool and agent misuse), and ecosystem risks (e.g., orchestration abuse, multi-agent collusion). Existing frameworks such as MITRE ATLAS, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) AI 100-2 Adversarial Machine Learning (AML) taxonomy, and OWASP Top 10s for Large Language Models (LLMs) and Agentic AI Applications provide valuable viewpoints, but each covers only slices of this multi-dimensional space. This paper presents Cisco's Integrated AI Security and Safety Framework ("AI Security Framework"), a unified, lifecycle-aware taxonomy and operationalization framework that can be used to classify, integrate, and operationalize the full range of AI risks. It integrates AI security and AI safety across modalities, agents, pipelines, and the broader ecosystem. The AI Security Framework is designed to be practical for threat identification, red-teaming, risk prioritization, and it is comprehensive in scope and can be extensible to emerging deployments in multimodal contexts, humanoids, wearables, and sensory infrastructures. We analyze gaps in prevailing frameworks, discuss design principles for our framework, and demonstrate how the taxonomy provides structure for understanding how modern AI systems fail, how adversaries exploit these failures, and how organizations can build defenses across the AI lifecycle that evolve alongside capability advancements.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Dec 2025.

Builds on

5 of 39 references.

References · 5

  1. 2016Concrete Problems in AI Safetycited by 1,582
  2. 2016Research Priorities for Robust and Beneficial Artificial Intelligencecited by 74
  3. 2025TRiSM for Agentic AI: A Review of Trust, Risk, and Security Management in LLM-based Agentic Multi-Agent Systemscited by 58
  4. 2025Designing Incident Reporting Systems for Harms from General-Purpose AIcited by 6
  5. 2025Making Sense of AI Limitations: How Individual Perceptions Shape Organizational Readiness for AI Adoptioncited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Human Society-Inspired Approaches to Agentic AI Security: The 4C Framework
  2. 2026From Adoption to Deployment: A Qualitative Study on AI Integration in Software Development Practice
  3. 2026Taxonomy-Driven Analysis of Open-Source AI Risk Mitigation Tools
  4. 2025A Different Approach to AI Safety: Proceedings from the Columbia Convening on Openness in Artificial Intelligence and AI Safety
  5. 2024SafetyAnalyst: Interpretable, Transparent, and Steerable Safety Moderation for AI Behavior
  6. 2026Bridging AI Risk Frameworks: Reconciling ISO/IEC 42001, the NIST AI Risk Management Framework, and the EU AI Act into a Uni ed Governance Taxonomy ↗
  7. 2026SCITUS: A Multi-Jurisdictional Framework for Adapting NIST AI RMF to the Canadian Regulatory Context ↗
  8. 2026UK AISI Alignment Evaluation Case-Study