mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

ERA-IT: Aligning Semantic Models with Revealed Economic Preference for Real-Time and Explainable Patent Valuation

arXiv 2512.12869 ↗First posted 14 Dec 2025cs.CE cs.CLcited by 0

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Human values and AI feedback alignment

Abstract (arXiv)

Valuing intangible assets under uncertainty remains a critical challenge in the strategic management of technological innovation due to the information asymmetry inherent in high-dimensional technical specifications. Traditional bibliometric indicators, such as citation counts, fail to address this friction in a timely manner due to the systemic latency inherent in data accumulation. To bridge this gap, this study proposes the Economic Reasoning Alignment via Instruction Tuning (ERA-IT) framework. We theoretically conceptualize patent renewal history as a revealed economic preference and leverage it as an objective supervisory signal to align the generative reasoning of Large Language Models (LLMs) with market realities, a process we term Eco-Semantic Alignment. Using a randomly sampled dataset of 10,000 European Patent Office patents across diverse technological domains, we trained the model not only to predict value tiers but also to reverse-engineer the Economic Chain-of-Thought from unstructured text. Empirical results demonstrate that ERA-IT significantly outperforms both conventional econometric models and zero-shot LLMs in predictive accuracy. More importantly, by generating explicit, logically grounded rationales for valuation, the framework serves as a transparent cognitive scaffold for decision-makers, reducing the opacity of black-box AI in high-stakes intellectual property management.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Human values and AI feedback alignment, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 11 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Dec 2025.

Builds on

11 of 48 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024InstructPatentGPT: Training patent language models to follow instructions with human feedback25 May

Other references · 10

  1. 2023Instruction Tuning for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 617
  2. 2022Towards Understanding Chain-of-Thought Prompting: An Empirical Study of What Matterscited by 221
  3. 2023Can Large Language Models Explain Themselves? A Study of LLM-Generated Self-Explanationscited by 90
  4. 2024(A)I Am Not a Lawyer, But...: Engaging Legal Experts towards Responsible LLM Policies for Legal Advicecited by 61
  5. 2022On the Explainability of Natural Language Processing Deep Modelscited by 37
  6. 2024Natural Language Processing in the Patent Domain: A Surveycited by 20
  7. 2024A Survey on Patent Analysis: From NLP to Multimodal AIcited by 10
  8. 2025PatentScore: Multi-dimensional Evaluation of LLM-Generated Patent Claimscited by 10
  9. 2025PatentMind: A Multi-Aspect Reasoning Graph for Patent Similarity Evaluationcited by 5
  10. 2025Self-Filtered Distillation with LLMs-generated Trust Indicators for Reliable Patent Classificationcited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Large Language Model for Patent Concept Generation
  2. 2024EvoPat: A Multi-LLM-based Patents Summarization and Analysis Agent
  3. 2025Enhancing the Patent Matching Capability of Large Language Models via the Memory Graph
  4. 2025PATENTWRITER: A Benchmarking Study for Patent Drafting with LLMs
  5. 2026Self-Knowledge Retrieval Augmented Generation Framework for Patent Matching
  6. 2025Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems for Intellectual Property via Synthetic Multi-Angle Fine-tuning
  7. 2025PEDANTIC: A Dataset for the Automatic Examination of Definiteness in Patent Claims
  8. 2025An automatic patent literature retrieval system based on LLM-RAG