ERA-IT: Aligning Semantic Models with Revealed Economic Preference for Real-Time and Explainable Patent Valuation
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Human values and AI feedback alignment
Abstract (arXiv)
Valuing intangible assets under uncertainty remains a critical challenge in the strategic management of technological innovation due to the information asymmetry inherent in high-dimensional technical specifications. Traditional bibliometric indicators, such as citation counts, fail to address this friction in a timely manner due to the systemic latency inherent in data accumulation. To bridge this gap, this study proposes the Economic Reasoning Alignment via Instruction Tuning (ERA-IT) framework. We theoretically conceptualize patent renewal history as a revealed economic preference and leverage it as an objective supervisory signal to align the generative reasoning of Large Language Models (LLMs) with market realities, a process we term Eco-Semantic Alignment. Using a randomly sampled dataset of 10,000 European Patent Office patents across diverse technological domains, we trained the model not only to predict value tiers but also to reverse-engineer the Economic Chain-of-Thought from unstructured text. Empirical results demonstrate that ERA-IT significantly outperforms both conventional econometric models and zero-shot LLMs in predictive accuracy. More importantly, by generating explicit, logically grounded rationales for valuation, the framework serves as a transparent cognitive scaffold for decision-makers, reducing the opacity of black-box AI in high-stakes intellectual property management.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Human values and AI feedback alignment, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 11 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Dec 2025.
Builds on
11 of 48 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
- 2024InstructPatentGPT: Training patent language models to follow instructions with human feedback25 May
Other references · 10
- 2023Instruction Tuning for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 617
- 2022Towards Understanding Chain-of-Thought Prompting: An Empirical Study of What Matterscited by 221
- 2023Can Large Language Models Explain Themselves? A Study of LLM-Generated Self-Explanationscited by 90
- 2024(A)I Am Not a Lawyer, But...: Engaging Legal Experts towards Responsible LLM Policies for Legal Advicecited by 61
- 2022On the Explainability of Natural Language Processing Deep Modelscited by 37
- 2024Natural Language Processing in the Patent Domain: A Surveycited by 20
- 2024A Survey on Patent Analysis: From NLP to Multimodal AIcited by 10
- 2025PatentScore: Multi-dimensional Evaluation of LLM-Generated Patent Claimscited by 10
- 2025PatentMind: A Multi-Aspect Reasoning Graph for Patent Similarity Evaluationcited by 5
- 2025Self-Filtered Distillation with LLMs-generated Trust Indicators for Reliable Patent Classificationcited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Large Language Model for Patent Concept Generation
- 2024EvoPat: A Multi-LLM-based Patents Summarization and Analysis Agent
- 2025Enhancing the Patent Matching Capability of Large Language Models via the Memory Graph
- 2025PATENTWRITER: A Benchmarking Study for Patent Drafting with LLMs
- 2026Self-Knowledge Retrieval Augmented Generation Framework for Patent Matching
- 2025Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems for Intellectual Property via Synthetic Multi-Angle Fine-tuning
- 2025PEDANTIC: A Dataset for the Automatic Examination of Definiteness in Patent Claims
- 2025An automatic patent literature retrieval system based on LLM-RAG