mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Credit Risk Estimation with Non-Financial Features: Evidence from a Synthetic Istanbul Dataset

arXiv 2512.12783 ↗First posted 14 Dec 2025cs.LG q-fin.ST stat.APcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Financial exclusion constrains entrepreneurship, increases income volatility, and widens wealth gaps. Underbanked consumers in Istanbul often have no bureau file because their earnings and payments flow through informal channels. To study how such borrowers can be evaluated we create a synthetic dataset of one hundred thousand Istanbul residents that reproduces first quarter 2025 T"U.IK (TURKSTAT) census marginals and telecom usage patterns. Retrieval augmented generation feeds these public statistics into the OpenAI o3 model, which synthesises realistic yet private records. Each profile contains seven socio demographic variables and nine alternative attributes that describe phone specifications, online shopping rhythm, subscription spend, car ownership, monthly rent, and a credit card flag. To test the impact of the alternative financial data CatBoost, LightGBM, and XGBoost are each trained in two versions. Demo models use only the socio demographic variables; Full models include both socio demographic and alternative attributes. Across five fold stratified validation the alternative block raises area under the curve by about one point three percentage and lifts balanced F 1 from roughly 0.84 to 0.95, a fourteen percent gain. We contribute an open Istanbul 2025 Q1 synthetic dataset, a fully reproducible modeling pipeline, and empirical evidence that a concise set of behavioural attributes can approach bureau level discrimination power while serving borrowers who lack formal credit records. These findings give lenders and regulators a transparent blueprint for extending fair and safe credit access to the underbanked.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Dec 2025.

Builds on

5 of 32 references.

References · 5

  1. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
  2. 2019Explaining Machine Learning Classifiers through Diverse Counterfactual Explanationscited by 614
  3. 2018CatBoost: gradient boosting with categorical features supportcited by 208
  4. 2020The Value of Big Data for Credit Scoring: Enhancing Financial Inclusion using Mobile Phone Data and Social Network Analyticscited by 21
  5. 2020Super-App Behavioral Patterns in Credit Risk Models: Financial, Statistical and Regulatory Implicationscited by 9

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2023FinDiff: Diffusion Models for Financial Tabular Data Generation
  2. 2025SocialCredit+
  3. 2026Communicating Credit Risk with Large Language Models: Evaluation of Explanations from Standard and Alternative Data-Based Models
  4. 2025Interpreting LLMs as Credit Risk Classifiers: Do Their Feature Explanations Align with Classical ML?
  5. 2026MortarBench: Evaluating Mortgage Loan Origination Agents
  6. 2025Interpretable LLMs for Credit Risk: A Systematic Review and Taxonomy
  7. 2025FinDER: Financial Dataset for Question Answering and Evaluating Retrieval-Augmented Generation
  8. 2024Customized FinGPT Search Agents Using Foundation Models