Causal inference and model explainability tools for retail
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Most major retailers today have multiple divisions focused on various aspects, such as marketing, supply chain, online customer experience, store customer experience, employee productivity, and vendor fulfillment. They also regularly collect data corresponding to all these aspects as dashboards and weekly/monthly/quarterly reports. Although several machine learning and statistical techniques have been in place to analyze and predict key metrics, such models typically lack interpretability. Moreover, such techniques also do not allow the validation or discovery of causal links. In this paper, we aim to provide a recipe for applying model interpretability and causal inference for deriving sales insights. In this paper, we review the existing literature on causal inference and interpretability in the context of problems in e-commerce and retail, and apply them to a real-world dataset. We find that an inherently explainable model has a lower variance of SHAP values, and show that including multiple confounders through a double machine learning approach allows us to get the correct sign of causal effect.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Dec 2025.
Builds on
6 of 26 references.
References · 6
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,156
- 2020Causal Shapley Values: Exploiting Causal Knowledge to Explain Individual Predictions of Complex Modelscited by 107
- 2020Evaluations and Methods for Explanation through Robustness Analysiscited by 51
- 2022Causal Inference in Recommender Systems: A Survey and Future Directionscited by 44
- 2020Enforcing Interpretability and its Statistical Impacts: Trade-offs between Accuracy and Interpretabilitycited by 25
Built on by
Not cited yet.