Exploring Topological Bias in Heterogeneous Graph Neural Networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) are characterized by their capacity of processing graph-structured data. However, due to the sparsity of labels under semi-supervised learning, they have been found to exhibit biased performance on specific nodes. This kind of bias has been validated to correlate with topological structure and is considered as a bottleneck of GNNs' performance. Existing work focuses on the study of homogeneous GNNs and little attention has been given to topological bias in Heterogeneous Graph Neural Networks (HGNNs). In this work, firstly, in order to distinguish distinct meta relations, we apply meta-weighting to the adjacency matrix of a heterogeneous graph. Based on the modified adjacency matrix, we leverage PageRank along with the node label information to construct a projection. The constructed projection effectively maps nodes to values that strongly correlated with model performance when using datasets both with and without intra-type connections, which demonstrates the universal existence of topological bias in HGNNs. To handle this bias, we propose a debiasing structure based on the difference in the mapped values of nodes and use it along with the original graph structure for contrastive learning. Experiments on three public datasets verify the effectiveness of the proposed method in improving HGNNs' performance and debiasing.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Dec 2025.
Builds on
25 of 39 references.
References · 25
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
- 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
- 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,923
- 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,320
- 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,393
- 2018Learning deep representations by mutual information estimation and maximizationcited by 1,273
- 2020Graph Contrastive Learning with Augmentationscited by 1,208
- 2018Deep Graph Infomaxcited by 1,106
- 2018Predict then Propagate: Graph Neural Networks meet Personalized PageRankcited by 993
- 2019Heterogeneous Graph Attention Networkcited by 734
- 2019Learning Representations by Maximizing Mutual Information Across Viewscited by 734
- 2020Contrastive Multi-View Representation Learning on Graphscited by 652
13 more
- 2020Deep Graph Contrastive Representation Learningcited by 539
- 2020Graph Contrastive Learning with Adaptive Augmentationcited by 519
- 2020MAGNN: Metapath Aggregated Graph Neural Network for Heterogeneous Graph Embeddingcited by 304
- 2021Are we really making much progress? Revisiting, benchmarking, and refining heterogeneous graph neural networkscited by 176
- 2021Self-supervised Heterogeneous Graph Neural Network with Co-contrastive Learningcited by 130
- 2020GraphNorm: A Principled Approach to Accelerating Graph Neural Network Trainingcited by 117
- 2021An Empirical Study of Graph Contrastive Learningcited by 113
- 2019Unsupervised Attributed Multiplex Network Embeddingcited by 95
- 2022Simple and Efficient Heterogeneous Graph Neural Networkcited by 71
- 2020Contrastive and Generative Graph Convolutional Networks for Graph-based Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 43
- 2022Uncovering the Structural Fairness in Graph Contrastive Learningcited by 29
- 2023Heterogeneous Graph Contrastive Learning for Recommendationcited by 28
- 2022Heterogeneous Graph Contrastive Learning with Meta-path Contexts and Adaptively Weighted Negative Samplescited by 6
Built on by
Not cited yet.