mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

SRLR: Symbolic Regression based Logic Recovery to Counter Programmable Logic Controller Attacks

arXiv 2512.11298 ↗First posted 12 Dec 2025cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Programmable Logic Controllers (PLCs) are critical components in Industrial Control Systems (ICSs). Their potential exposure to external world makes them susceptible to cyber-attacks. Existing detection methods against controller logic attacks use either specification-based or learnt models. However, specification-based models require experts' manual efforts or access to PLC's source code, while machine learning-based models often fall short of providing explanation for their decisions. We design SRLR -- a it Symbolic Regression based Logic Recovery} solution to identify the logic of a PLC based only on its inputs and outputs. The recovered logic is used to generate explainable rules for detecting controller logic attacks. SRLR enhances the latest deep symbolic regression methods using the following ICS-specific properties: (1) some important ICS control logic is best represented in frequency domain rather than time domain; (2) an ICS controller can operate in multiple modes, each using different logic, where mode switches usually do not happen frequently; (3) a robust controller usually filters out outlier inputs as ICS sensor data can be noisy; and (4) with the above factors captured, the degree of complexity of the formulas is reduced, making effective search possible. Thanks to these enhancements, SRLR consistently outperforms all existing methods in a variety of ICS settings that we evaluate. In terms of the recovery accuracy, SRLR's gain can be as high as 39% in some challenging environment. We also evaluate SRLR on a distribution grid containing hundreds of voltage regulators, demonstrating its stability in handling large-scale, complex systems with varied configurations.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Dec 2025.

Builds on

15 of 65 references.

References · 15

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  2. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  3. 2018Detecting Spacecraft Anomalies Using LSTMs and Nonparametric Dynamic Thresholdingcited by 407
  4. 2021Graph Neural Network-Based Anomaly Detection in Multivariate Time Seriescited by 300
  5. 2019Deep symbolic regression: Recovering mathematical expressions from data via risk-seeking policy gradientscited by 294
  6. 2016LSTM-based Encoder-Decoder for Multi-sensor Anomaly Detectioncited by 213
  7. 2016Visualizing the Effects of Predictor Variables in Black Box Supervised Learning Modelscited by 212
  8. 2022TranAD: Deep Transformer Networks for Anomaly Detection in Multivariate Time Series Datacited by 211
  9. 2021SymbolicGPT: A Generative Transformer Model for Symbolic Regressioncited by 101
  10. 2021Symbolic Regression via Neural-Guided Genetic Programming Population Seedingcited by 97
  11. 2023Interpretable Machine Learning for Science with PySR and SymbolicRegression.jlcited by 36
  12. 2021Time Series Anomaly Detection for Cyber-Physical Systems via Neural System Identification and Bayesian Filteringcited by 31
3 more
  1. 2023Deep Generative Symbolic Regressioncited by 27
  2. 2021DeepAID: Interpreting and Improving Deep Learning-based Anomaly Detection in Security Applicationscited by 18
  3. 2018Data-driven Discovery of Cyber-Physical Systemscited by 13

Built on by

Not cited yet.