mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Do We Need Reformer for Vision? An Experimental Comparison with Vision Transformers

arXiv 2512.11260 ↗First posted 12 Dec 2025cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Transformers have recently demonstrated strong performance in computer vision, with Vision Transformers (ViTs) leveraging self-attention to capture both low-level and high-level image features. However, standard ViTs remain computationally expensive, since global self-attention scales quadratically with the number of tokens, which limits their practicality for high-resolution inputs and resource-constrained settings. In this work, we investigate the Reformer architecture as an alternative vision backbone. By combining patch-based tokenization with locality-sensitive hashing (LSH) attention, our model approximates global self-attention while reducing its theoretical time complexity from O(n2) to O(n log n) in the sequence length n. We evaluate the proposed Reformer-based vision model on CIFAR-10 to assess its behavior on small-scale datasets, on ImageNet-100 to study its accuracy--efficiency trade-off in a more realistic setting, and on a high-resolution medical imaging dataset to evaluate the model under longer token sequences. While the Reformer achieves higher accuracy on CIFAR-10 compared to our ViT-style baseline, the ViT model consistently outperforms the Reformer in our experiments in terms of practical efficiency and end-to-end computation time across the larger and higher-resolution settings. These results suggest that, despite the theoretical advantages of LSH-based attention, meaningful computation gains require sequence lengths substantially longer than those produced by typical high-resolution images.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 10 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Dec 2025.

Builds on

7 of 10 references.

References · 7

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2020Reformer: The Efficient Transformercited by 1,658
  3. 2019On the Relationship between Self-Attention and Convolutional Layerscited by 299
  4. 2025Vision Transformers on the Edge: A Comprehensive Survey of Model Compression and Acceleration Strategiescited by 24
  5. 2023Which Transformer to Favor: A Comparative Analysis of Efficiency in Vision Transformerscited by 9
  6. 2025Mobile U-ViT: Revisiting large kernel and U-shaped ViT for efficient medical image segmentationcited by 6
  7. 2025Unifying Convolution and Attention via Convolutional Nearest Neighborscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.