mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

COMPARE: Clinical Optimization with Modular Planning and Assessment via RAG-Enhanced AI-OCT: Superior Decision Support for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Compared to ChatGPT-5 and Junior Operators

arXiv 2512.10702 ↗First posted 11 Dec 2025cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Background: While intravascular imaging, particularly optical coherence tomography (OCT), improves percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) outcomes, its interpretation is operator-dependent. General-purpose artificial intelligence (AI) shows promise but lacks domain-specific reliability. We evaluated the performance of CA-GPT, a novel large model deployed on an AI-OCT system, against that of the general-purpose ChatGPT-5 and junior physicians for OCT-guided PCI planning and assessment. Methods: In this single-center analysis of 96 patients who underwent OCT-guided PCI, the procedural decisions generated by the CA-GPT, ChatGPT-5, and junior physicians were compared with an expert-derived procedural record. Agreement was assessed using ten pre-specified metrics across pre-PCI and post-PCI phases. Results: For pre-PCI planning, CA-GPT demonstrated significantly higher median agreement scores (5[IQR 3.75-5]) compared to both ChatGPT-5 (3[2-4], P<0.001) and junior physicians (4[3-4], P<0.001). CA-GPT significantly outperformed ChatGPT-5 across all individual pre-PCI metrics and showed superior performance to junior physicians in stent diameter (90.3% vs. 72.2%, P<0.05) and length selection (80.6% vs. 52.8%, P<0.01). In post-PCI assessment, CA-GPT maintained excellent overall agreement (5[4.75-5]), significantly higher than both ChatGPT-5 (4[4-5], P<0.001) and junior physicians (5[4-5], P<0.05). Subgroup analysis confirmed CA-GPT's robust performance advantage in complex scenarios. Conclusion: The CA-GPT-based AI-OCT system achieved superior decision-making agreement versus a general-purpose large language model and junior physicians across both PCI planning and assessment phases. This approach provides a standardized and reliable method for intravascular imaging interpretation, demonstrating significant potential to augment operator expertise and optimize OCT-guided PCI.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Dec 2025.

Builds on

4 of 36 references.

References · 4

  1. 2023Capabilities of GPT-4 on Medical Challenge Problemscited by 638
  2. 2024Hallucination is Inevitable: An Innate Limitation of Large Language Modelscited by 332
  3. 2024Reducing hallucination in structured outputs via Retrieval-Augmented Generationcited by 93
  4. 2023Evaluation of ChatGPT-Generated Medical Responses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysiscited by 13

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Can Multimodal Large Language Models Understand OCT?
  2. 2026CARDEA: Auditable Reasoning Grounded in Spatial Evidence for End-to-End Coronary Angiography Interpretation
  3. 2025CAG-VLM: Fine-Tuning of a Large-Scale Model to Recognize Angiographic Images for Next-Generation Diagnostic Systems
  4. 2023Holistic Evaluation of GPT-4V for Biomedical Imaging
  5. 2023Enhancing Medical Task Performance in GPT-4V: A Comprehensive Study on Prompt Engineering Strategies
  6. 2026Co-Annotator: Expert-Distilled ViT and VLM for Visual and Documentation Guidance in Age-Related Macular Degeneration
  7. 2024Artificial Intelligence in the Autonomous Navigation of Endovascular Interventions: A Systematic Review
  8. 2025Sim4EndoR: A Reinforcement Learning Centered Simulation Platform for Task Automation of Endovascular Robotics