Don't Throw Away Your Beams: Improving Consistency-based Uncertainties in LLMs via Beam Search
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Consistency-based methods have emerged as an effective approach to uncertainty quantification (UQ) in large language models. These methods typically rely on several generations obtained via multinomial sampling, measuring their agreement level. However, in short-form QA, multinomial sampling is prone to producing duplicates due to peaked distributions, and its stochasticity introduces considerable variance in uncertainty estimates across runs. We introduce a new family of methods that employ beam search to generate candidates for consistency-based UQ, yielding improved performance and reduced variance compared to multinomial sampling. We also provide a theoretical lower bound on the beam set probability mass under which beam search achieves a smaller error than multinomial sampling. We empirically evaluate our approach on six QA datasets and find that its consistent improvements over multinomial sampling lead to state-of-the-art UQ performance.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Dec 2025.
Builds on
29 of 35 references.
References · 29
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
- 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,886
- 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,754
- 2017TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehensioncited by 2,955
- 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,916
- 2020DeBERTa: Decoding-enhanced BERT with Disentangled Attentioncited by 2,181
- 2022Language Models (Mostly) Know What They Knowcited by 1,856
- 2018CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledgecited by 1,822
- 2023Semantic Uncertainty: Linguistic Invariances for Uncertainty Estimation in Natural Language Generationcited by 819
- 2023Just Ask for Calibration: Strategies for Eliciting Calibrated Confidence Scores from Language Models Fine-Tuned with Human Feedbackcited by 812
- 2018CoQA: A Conversational Question Answering Challengecited by 683
17 more
- 2023Generating with Confidence: Uncertainty Quantification for Black-box Large Language Modelscited by 293
- 2023AlignScore: Evaluating Factual Consistency with a Unified Alignment Functioncited by 288
- 2020Unsupervised Quality Estimation for Neural Machine Translationcited by 211
- 2024Fact-Checking the Output of Large Language Models via Token-Level Uncertainty Quantificationcited by 162
- 2023Shifting Attention to Relevance: Towards the Predictive Uncertainty Quantification of Free-Form Large Language Modelscited by 150
- 2023LM-Polygraph: Uncertainty Estimation for Language Modelscited by 131
- 2024Benchmarking Uncertainty Quantification Methods for Large Language Models with LM-Polygraphcited by 105
- 2018Quantifying Uncertainties in Natural Language Processing Taskscited by 79
- 2025A Survey of Uncertainty Estimation Methods on Large Language Modelscited by 62
- 2023Uncertainty in Natural Language Generation: From Theory to Applicationscited by 61
- 2024LawLLM: Law Large Language Model for the US Legal Systemcited by 37
- 2022Detection of Word Adversarial Examples in Text Classification: Benchmark and Baseline via Robust Density Estimationcited by 32
- 2025Uncertainty Quantification for LLMs through Minimum Bayes Risk: Bridging Confidence and Consistencycited by 30
- 2024Adaptive Contrastive Search: Uncertainty-Guided Decoding for Open-Ended Text Generationcited by 27
- 2025Uncertainty-Aware Decoding with Minimum Bayes Riskcited by 11
- 2025GUARD: Glocal Uncertainty-Aware Robust Decoding for Effective and Efficient Open-Ended Text Generationcited by 10
- 2025Decoding Uncertainty: The Impact of Decoding Strategies for Uncertainty Estimation in Large Language Modelscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.