mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Rates and architectures for learning geometrically non-trivial operators

arXiv 2512.09376 ↗First posted 10 Dec 2025cs.LG cs.CV eess.IVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep learning methods have proven capable of recovering operators between high-dimensional spaces, such as solution maps of PDEs and similar objects in mathematical physics, from very few training samples. This phenomenon of data-efficiency has been proven for certain classes of elliptic operators with simple geometry, i.e., operators that do not change the domain of the function or propagate singularities. However, scientific machine learning is commonly used for problems that do involve the propagation of singularities in a priori unknown ways, such as waves, advection, and fluid dynamics. In light of this, we expand the learning theory to include double fibration transforms--geometric integral operators that include generalized Radon and geodesic ray transforms. We prove that this class of operators does not suffer from the curse of dimensionality: the error decays superalgebraically, that is, faster than any fixed power of the reciprocal of the number of training samples. Furthermore, we investigate architectures that explicitly encode the geometry of these transforms, demonstrating that an architecture reminiscent of cross-attention based on levelset methods yields a parameterization that is universal, stable, and learns double fibration transforms from very few training examples. Our results contribute to a rapidly-growing line of theoretical work on learning operators for scientific machine learning.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 38 of its 72 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Dec 2025.

Builds on

38 of 72 references.

References · 38

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,530
  3. 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,806
  4. 2020Implicit Neural Representations with Periodic Activation Functionscited by 2,214
  5. 2019DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operatorscited by 1,965
  6. 2020Nerfies: Deformable Neural Radiance Fieldscited by 1,194
  7. 2022FourCastNet: A Global Data-driven High-resolution Weather Model using Adaptive Fourier Neural Operatorscited by 748
  8. 2020Implicit Geometric Regularization for Learning Shapescited by 707
  9. 2017DGM: A deep learning algorithm for solving partial differential equationscited by 674
  10. 2022Scientific Machine Learning through Physics-Informed Neural Networks: Where we are and What's nextcited by 603
  11. 2017The Deep Ritz method: A deep learning-based numerical algorithm for solving variational problemscited by 581
  12. 2021Learning the solution operator of parametric partial differential equations with physics-informed DeepOnetscited by 537
26 more
  1. 2022Fourier Neural Operator with Learned Deformations for PDEs on General Geometriescited by 416
  2. 2020Model Reduction and Neural Networks for Parametric PDEscited by 257
  3. 2023WIRE: Wavelet Implicit Neural Representationscited by 220
  4. 2018PDE-Net 2.0: Learning PDEs from Data with A Numeric-Symbolic Hybrid Deep Networkcited by 208
  5. 2023A Mathematical Guide to Operator Learningcited by 74
  6. 2020DeepGreen: Deep Learning of Green's Functions for Nonlinear Boundary Value Problemscited by 61
  7. 2021Convergence Rates for Learning Linear Operators from Noisy Datacited by 55
  8. 2019Deep Level Sets: Implicit Surface Representations for 3D Shape Inferencecited by 52
  9. 2021Data-driven discovery of Green's functions with human-understandable deep learningcited by 43
  10. 2021Learning elliptic partial differential equations with randomized linear algebracited by 29
  11. 2023Elliptic PDE learning is provably data-efficientcited by 26
  12. 2020Bridging Physics-based and Data-driven modeling for Learning Dynamical Systemscited by 25
  13. 2022Learning Green's functions associated with time-dependent partial differential equationscited by 25
  14. 2022Discovering Nonlinear PDEs from Scarce Data with Physics-encoded Learningcited by 24
  15. 2022Neural Integral Equationscited by 23
  16. 2020Deep Neural Networks Are Effective At Learning High-Dimensional Hilbert-Valued Functions From Limited Datacited by 22
  17. 2019Solving Electrical Impedance Tomography with Deep Learningcited by 18
  18. 2023Deep Operator Learning Lessens the Curse of Dimensionality for PDEscited by 18
  19. 2019Deep learning architectures for nonlinear operator functions and nonlinear inverse problemscited by 17
  20. 2020Deep neural networks for inverse problems with pseudodifferential operators: an application to limited-angle tomographycited by 15
  21. 2023Implicit Neural Representations and the Algebra of Complex Waveletscited by 8
  22. 2024Operator learning without the adjointcited by 8
  23. 2019Learning Schatten--von Neumann Operatorscited by 7
  24. 2020Learning the geometry of wave-based imagingcited by 7
  25. 2024Glimpse: Generalized Locality for Scalable and Robust CTcited by 6
  26. 2024Ice-Tide: Implicit Cryo-ET Imaging and Deformation Estimationcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.