SpeechQualityLLM: LLM-Based Multimodal Assessment of Speech Quality
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Objective speech quality assessment is central to telephony, VoIP, and streaming systems, where large volumes of degraded audio must be monitored and optimized at scale. Classical metrics such as PESQ and POLQA approximate human mean opinion scores (MOS) but require carefully controlled conditions and expensive listening tests, while learning-based models such as NISQA regress MOS and multiple perceptual dimensions from waveforms or spectrograms, achieving high correlation with subjective ratings yet remaining rigid: they do not support interactive, natural-language queries and do not natively provide textual rationales. In this work, we introduce SpeechQualityLLM, a multimodal speech quality question-answering (QA) system that couples an audio encoder with a language model and is trained on the NISQA corpus using template-based question-answer pairs covering overall MOS and four perceptual dimensions (noisiness, coloration, discontinuity, and loudness) in both single-ended (degraded only) and double-ended (degraded plus clean reference) setups. Instead of directly regressing scores, our system is supervised to generate textual answers from which numeric predictions are parsed and evaluated with standard regression and ranking metrics; on held-out NISQA clips, the double-ended model attains a MOS mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.41 with Pearson correlation of 0.86, with competitive performance on dimension-wise tasks. Beyond these quantitative gains, it offers a flexible natural-language interface in which the language model acts as an audio quality expert: practitioners can query arbitrary aspects of degradations, prompt the model to emulate different listener profiles to capture human variability and produce diverse but plausible judgments rather than a single deterministic score, and thereby reduce reliance on large-scale crowdsourced tests and their monetary cost.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 12 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Dec 2025.
Builds on
6 of 12 references.
References · 6
- 2022Robust Speech Recognition via Large-Scale Weak Supervisioncited by 3,972
- 2018SDR - half-baked or well done?cited by 420
- 2021NISQA: A Deep CNN-Self-Attention Model for Multidimensional Speech Quality Prediction with Crowdsourced Datasetscited by 189
- 2021DNSMOS P.835: A Non-Intrusive Perceptual Objective Speech Quality Metric to Evaluate Noise Suppressorscited by 165
- 2025Spark-TTS: An Efficient LLM-Based Text-to-Speech Model with Single-Stream Decoupled Speech Tokenscited by 109
- 2023Audio-Visual LLM for Video Understandingcited by 76
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.
4 papers.
- 2026Calibration-Reasoning Framework for Descriptive Speech Quality Assessmentcited by 1
- 2026JASTIN: Aligning LLMs for Zero-Shot Audio and Speech Evaluation via Natural Language Instructionscited by 1
- 2026A Reliability Assessment of LALM Audio Judges for Full-Duplex Voice Agentscited by 1
- 2026Beyond Naturalness: Probing Automated Text-To-Speech Evaluators on Linguistically Grounded Dimensionscited by 0
- 2026Beyond Naturalness: Probing Automated Text-To-Speech Evaluators on Linguistically Grounded Dimensions10 Aug 2026
- 2026A Reliability Assessment of LALM Audio Judges for Full-Duplex Voice Agents8 Jul 2026
- 2026JASTIN: Aligning LLMs for Zero-Shot Audio and Speech Evaluation via Natural Language Instructions6 May 2026
- 2026Calibration-Reasoning Framework for Descriptive Speech Quality Assessment10 Mar 2026