Correction of Decoupled Weight Decay
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Decoupled weight decay, solely responsible for the performance advantage of AdamW over Adam, has long been set to proportional to learning rate γ without questioning. Some researchers have recently challenged such assumption and argued that decoupled weight decay should be set propto γ2 instead based on orthogonality arguments at steady state. To the contrary, we find that eliminating the contribution of the perpendicular component of the update to the weight norm leads to little change to the training dynamics. Instead, we derive that decoupled weight decay propto γ2 results in stable weight norm based on the simple assumption that updates become independent of the weights at steady state, regardless of the nature of the optimizer. Based on the same assumption, we derive and empirically verify that the Total Update Contribution (TUC) of a minibatch under the Scion optimizer is better characterized by the momentum-dependent effective learning rate whose optimal value transfers and we show that decoupled weight decay propto γ2 leads to stable weight and gradient norms and allows us to better control the training dynamics and improve the model performance.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Dec 2025.
Builds on
20 of 29 references.
References · 20
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
- 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,183
- 2020Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentioncited by 4,586
- 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,241
- 2019RandAugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search spacecited by 2,269
- 2019ZeRO: Memory Optimizations Toward Training Trillion Parameter Modelscited by 1,301
- 2024The FineWeb Datasets: Decanting the Web for the Finest Text Data at Scalecited by 1,160
- 2023Symbolic Discovery of Optimization Algorithmscited by 434
- 2025Training Deep Learning Models with Norm-Constrained LMOscited by 192
- 2024Why Transformers Need Adam: A Hessian Perspectivecited by 124
- 2018Three Mechanisms of Weight Decay Regularizationcited by 113
- 2025The Polar Express: Optimal Matrix Sign Methods and Their Application to the Muon Algorithmcited by 110
8 more
- 2022Better plain ViT baselines for ImageNet-1kcited by 98
- 2023Why Do We Need Weight Decay in Modern Deep Learning?cited by 72
- 2023Rotational Equilibrium: How Weight Decay Balances Learning Across Neural Networkscited by 53
- 2024How to set AdamW's weight decay as you scale model and dataset sizecited by 43
- 2025In Search of Adam's Secret Saucecited by 40
- 2024Weight decay induces low-rank attention layerscited by 27
- 2020On the Overlooked Pitfalls of Weight Decay and How to Mitigate Them: A Gradient-Norm Perspectivecited by 25
- 2025Why Gradients Rapidly Increase Near the End of Trainingcited by 22
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.